D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
Not here to shit on Grealish, but it remains baffling to me that we paid double what Liverpool paid to get Luis Diaz who has already shown more for them in half the time
If you had any expectation at all about this then you are watching the wrong sport.100M for a such a player was a big mistake.
He may improve but do not think he will turn from this to league dominating leading scorer which is what that amount of money demands.
You expect him to be a leading scorer?100M for a such a player was a big mistake.
He may improve but do not think he will turn from this to league dominating leading scorer which is what that amount of money demands.
Do you mean Gabby, who has also taken a ton of criticism in his thread?
Not here to shit on Grealish, but it remains baffling to me that we paid double what Liverpool paid to get Luis Diaz who has already shown more for them in half the time
Well I watch Diaz and Jota and Son in this league, nowhere carrying such pricing, scoring for fun, so I think I am watching the right sport.If you had any expectation at all about this then you are watching the wrong sport.
Ok so we overpaid with our eyes open, does not make the decision right.You expect him to be a leading scorer?
A player who before we bought him highest return was 10 goals in 41 games or 29 goals in 185 games.
No wonder some people get so disappointed in life.
Of course, it may also be that we never showed interest. But it was such a better piece of business for themMaybe he preferred to go there rather than come here. Maybe he wasn't available in the summer and we didn't want to wait around. There's an infinite number of reasons why it's rarely that straight forward.
So you expected Grealish, a midfielder who played at Aston Villa with I think best season of 10 goals to magically turn into a striker who scores 20+. Is that correct?Well I watch Diaz and Jota and Son in this league, nowhere carrying such pricing, scoring for fun, so I think I am watching the right sport.