mrbelfry
Well-Known Member
After the first few games he played for City I thought he might be a little quiet and lack a little personality. I thought he may get overawed by the other players and forgotten about. Seems Im an idiot
Come on, that was clearly tongue in cheekCome on. Alvarez is great. Haaland is vastly better.
think he's grown a ton in this WC tourney, City gets the benefitAfter the first few games he played for City I thought he might be a little quiet and lack a little personality. I thought he may get overawed by the other players and forgotten about. Seems Im an idiot
Hi there. Do one. Thanks.If you guys dont mind him Real Madrid will.Hopefully its the latter as River will as with Enzo gain a lot
Playing Alvarez on the wing is not an improvement on Grealish or Mahrez.Alvarez can literally play anywhere in the front 3 though, so no need to be facetious. If we want to just let Alvarez be a backup striker to Haaland and ONLY that, then we can kiss goodbye to him within a few years. We’ll need to use him from a wider position, or change formation and play him behind Haaland. But that affects KDB quite a bit, unless we go with a back 3. But these are the conversations Pep and his coaching staff will be having. Alvarez can’t be ignored.
Agüero, Demichelis, Zabaleta (2014)Has there ever been a current City player in a World Cup final before? I really can’t think of one.