2020 US Elections

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

She made her bed , she could have divorced him years ago, maybe she is afraid he wouldnt give her a settlement if she did , who knows ,it is however hard enough to be in the white house when the spouse , michelle used to say how difficult the loss of freedom was

Knowing Trump, the prenup must be water tight. She ain't getting a single cent.

His mate Vlad could probably take care of things for him anyway.

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

What is this that if you havent voted for two years but vote this time it wont be counted ?

It's likely the criteria Red States have used to remove swathes of voters from the register.

 

[SWP's back]

See the trophy robot was wheeled out last night to read a autocue with her robot voice , very inspiring

She’s as much a **** as he is.

 

[FogBlueInSanFran]

Knowing Trump, the prenup must be water tight. She ain't getting a single cent.

His mate Vlad could probably take care of things for him anyway.

I am sure it includes a non-disclosure. But if she dictates all her feelings and stories to Barron anonymously, he can publish a book called "My Father, The Fucking Asshole" under his own name when he turns 18 and make a mint of money for them both.

As I said, totally get if people hate her, blame her, etc. and wouldn't argue it; it's just a personal thing. I feel like she's suffering more greatly than she deserves and I can't help feeling bad about it. Like Shylock in The Merchant of Venice.

 

[kaz7]

It's likely the criteria Red States have used to remove swathes of voters from the register.

Is that legal then ?

 

[Gareth Barry Conlon]

Is that legal then ?

Haha good one...

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

You know we get on on a great deal of subjects but I just don’t see that matey.

Just my perception mate, his advisers are keeping Biden away from the spotlight as much as anybody possibly can running for president and in a pandemic.

And again, just from my own media perspective, I do find it incredible that the main stream media in the States don't seem to want to report on the Hunter Biden situation, certainly with regards the guy who has put his dad in the same room this week?

 

[kaz7]

Just my perception mate, his advisers are keeping Biden away from the spotlight as much as anybody possibly can running for president and in a pandemic.

And again, just from my own media perspective, I do find it incredible that the main stream media in the States don't seem to want to report on the Hunter Biden situation, certainly with regards the guy who has put his dad in the same room this week?

Who is less corrupt is the choice , the hunter biden thing or the kids in league with russia and trump being the most corrupt arsehole in recent history
Oh and he is racist ,sexist and a compulsive liar to name just a few

 

[FogBlueInSanFran]

Just my perception mate, his advisers are keeping Biden away from the spotlight as much as anybody possibly can running for president and in a pandemic.

And again, just from my own media perspective, I do find it incredible that the main stream media in the States don't seem to want to report on the Hunter Biden situation, certainly with regards the guy who has put his dad in the same room this week?

This last sentence makes no sense -- it HAS been reported, but Biden is doing the right thing politically as he did with Tara Reade which is choking it off as a topic or firing the hypocrisy rejoinder (as he should) directly at Trump given his own kids' issues. It's a thin story with a bad trail, and the MSM can't find any evidence reed to hang onto and the Tara Reade thing fizzled and that was easier to understand and arguably more scurrilous because it directly involved the candidate. If there isn't good evidence whatever Hunter did benefitted Joe, then there is no story. If we want to make the story about Hunter, fine; let's cover the Trump kids in detail too. It's a loser.

From Politico today: The Wall Street Journal and Fox News have both reported finding no evidence that former Vice President Joe Biden benefited from the Hunter Biden business dealings that have drawn scrutiny. More explicitly pro-Trump media outlets — OAN, Breitbart, Newsmax — have mostly shied away from publishing fresher, more salacious allegations. And conservative talking heads — pundits, politicians and loud MAGA Twitter personalities alike — have been more focused on the meta narrative around the laptop, arguing that mainstream media, social media companies and the deep state are conspiring to prevent President Donald Trump’s reelection by suppressing the story.

This paragraph makes it clear what's going on: everyone sees things slipping away from Trump. THIS is the real issue.

The "meta-narrative" is red meat to a few on here who are used to the UK press. I worked in media and whenever I see generalizations made about media narratives and good journalists mixed in with bad ones to create a generalized "MSM" narrative about "ALL" the press it raises my hackles because so many here don't have clue one how investigative journalism works.

The reputable portions of the MSM and the populist fringe players see the writing on the wall -- they have their own futures to think about, like what happens if it looks like they're in Trump's pocket and then Trump goes to zero? The clock is ticking on bad conservative-leaning media to retain relevance and an audience. The WSJ and Fox have futures because they are real companies with real reporters and real investigative practices and journalistic integrity (or they have had in the past) and Breitbart et al don't because they aren't.

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

This last sentence makes no sense -- it HAS been reported, but Biden is doing the right thing politically as he did with Tara Reade which is choking it off as a topic or firing the hypocrisy rejoinder (as he should) directly at Trump given his own kids' issues. It's a thin story with a bad trail, and the MSM can't find any evidence reed to hang onto and the Tara Reade thing fizzled and that was easier to understand and arguably more scurrilous because it directly involved the candidate. If there isn't good evidence whatever Hunter did benefitted Joe, then there is no story. If we want to make the story about Hunter, fine; let's cover the Trump kids in detail too. It's a loser.

From Politico today: The Wall Street Journal and Fox News have both reported finding no evidence that former Vice President Joe Biden benefited from the Hunter Biden business dealings that have drawn scrutiny. More explicitly pro-Trump media outlets — OAN, Breitbart, Newsmax — have mostly shied away from publishing fresher, more salacious allegations. And conservative talking heads — pundits, politicians and loud MAGA Twitter personalities alike — have been more focused on the meta narrative around the laptop, arguing that mainstream media, social media companies and the deep state are conspiring to prevent President Donald Trump’s reelection by suppressing the story.

This paragraph makes it clear what's going on: everyone sees things slipping away from Trump. THIS is the real issue.

The "meta-narrative" is red meat to a few on here who are used to the UK press. I worked in media and whenever I see generalizations made about media narratives and good journalists mixed in with bad ones to create a generalized "MSM" narrative about "ALL" the press it raises my hackles because so many here don't have clue one how investigative journalism works.

The reputable portions of the MSM see the writing on the wall -- they have their own futures to think about, like what happens if it looks like they're in Trump's pocket and then Trump goes to zero? The clock is ticking on bad conservative-leaning media to retain relevance and an audience. The WSJ and Fox have futures because they are real companies with real reporters and real investigative practices and journalistic integrity (or they have had in the past) and Breitbart et al don't because they aren't.

Zodiac, True Story, Spotlight, The Post are all good films about proper investigative journalism.