Status
Not open for further replies.
One person spoke compassionately and seriously about a global pandemic alongside outlining actual plans with regards to health care and the economy.

One person gave a white supremacy group a new slogan and how his opponent wants to ban cows.

Yet both sounded like wankers....
 
What did Biden say to make you think that way about him?

1. He wouldn't shut up.

2. He did the pathetic "talk to camera" shit that is patronising

3. He literally said "I refuse to answer that question" about a constitutional issue in a debate about future policy.

4. He called Trunp a racist, a clown and a bunch of other things then claimed he wasn't acting Presidential while himself running for President.

5. "Nuh uh" and "no u" is not an argument.

This wasn't a debate, it was two geriatric pumped up tossers trying to sound tough and trying not to seem weak but ironically looking weak as fuck while doing so. It was a total waste of time for anybody who isn't some partisan Twatter who likes to talks about who "won" and how their candidate "totally pwned". It was shit.
 
1. He wouldn't shut up.

2. He did the pathetic "talk to camera" shit that is patronising

3. He literally said "I refuse to answer that question" about a constitutional issue in a debate about future policy.

4. He called Trunp a racist, a clown and a bunch of other things then claimed he wasn't acting Presidential while himself running for President.

5. "Nuh uh" and "no u" is not an argument.

This wasn't a debate, it was two geriatric pumped up tossers trying to sound tough and trying not to seem weak but ironically looking weak as fuck while doing so. It was a total waste of time for anybody who isn't some partisan Twatter who likes to talks about who "won" and how their candidate "totally pwned". It was shit.

“Old men bad” then, I guess?
 
1. He wouldn't shut up.

2. He did the pathetic "talk to camera" shit that is patronising

3. He literally said "I refuse to answer that question" about a constitutional issue in a debate about future policy.

4. He called Trunp a racist, a clown and a bunch of other things then claimed he wasn't acting Presidential while himself running for President.

5. "Nuh uh" and "no u" is not an argument.

This wasn't a debate, it was two geriatric pumped up tossers trying to sound tough and trying not to seem weak but ironically looking weak as fuck while doing so. It was a total waste of time for anybody who isn't some partisan Twatter who likes to talks about who "won" and how their candidate "totally pwned". It was shit.
Points 1, 2 & 5 are just an observation about his mannerisms. Point 4 is pretty standard fare for political debate. Point 3 I agree on, Biden was poor there.

However none of them equate to refusing to denounce white supremacy nor failing to accurately announce what tax you paid after being accused of tax avoidance.

Might both be wankers but one's certainly in his own league.
 
It's just so hard to choose a winner between the guy who encouraged white supremacist gangs to terrorize people and the guy who didn't do that
I know, I mean, the candidate who didn't call a white supremacist group to arms is just as much a wanker than the one who did amirite?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.