However none of them equate to refusing to denounce white supremacy
Riiigghhht!He literally did this
Riiigghhht!
Stand back and stand by! That told them. Clear as day, that.
No, definitely "Stand back and stand by" before quickly returning to ranting about the radical left/ANTIFA.I'm pretty sure he was literally asked to tell people to stand back. Maybe stand down. Something like this.
He also said "yes" when asked if he denounces it but I guess we're all ignoring that
No, definitely "Stand back and stand by" before quickly returning to ranting about the radical left/ANTIFA.
He hid his ever-so-clear message within an attack of the opposing side, the very definition of a politician being a wanker.
He's on record for saying Trump's character means nothing because he thought/thinks he was/is doing a good job as President.Thats funny, I was thinking the same thing about someone else in this thread.
No, definitely "Stand down and stand by" before quickly returning to ranting about the radical left/ANTIFA.
He hid his ever-so-clear message within an attack of the opposing side, the very definition of a politician being a wanker.
Well we were discussing wankermanship, so whilst he may have mumbled "yes" somewhere after being asked more than once to denounce 1 white supremacist group before then apparently part de-denouncing with his "stand back and stand by", he clearly didn't handle that question as well as Biden. Moreover, when he said "yes" was that answering the moderator asking would he answer the question or announcing that he would denounce. Might need to watch that again but to be less clear than Biden is a feat in itself.So just to be clear, we're ignoring the part where he denounces it in the discussion about whether he denounced it? And even if he did denounce it then he didn't really denounce it?
So basically no matter was said or not said, he didn't denounce it?
Well this is ironic :)Biden brought up his sons drug use. At least try to pay attention