Who do you think has implemented actions to ensure that the result will not reflect the full voting intentions of the electorate whether by voter suppression, disenfranchisement or impeding the transfer of ballots for counting?Even if it were true that only one side had done this, the fair and smart thing to do would be to seek assurances from both sides that they won't attempt to undermine a democracy.
But it's not true that just one side has, many Democratic surrogates have pointedly stated Biden should not concede no matter what. So at a minimum, it's a question that both should get and answer.
Haley, by the way was the honorable Governor of the Racist, Sexist, and Xenophobic South Carolina.Thirty years ago the Conservative Party got its head around being led by a lowly grocer's daughter, so why not?
"If I win, that will be accepted. If I lose, that will be accepted"He wasn't asked the direct question, but I'll concede he answered "yes" he'll accept when all the votes are counted.
Which is a slick answer. But a fair enough Yes.
Both parties are disenfranchising Americans in whatever Swing States they can.Who do you think has implemented actions to ensure that the result will not reflect the full voting intentions of the electorate whether by voter suppression, disenfranchisement or impeding the transfer of ballots for counting?
With that all in place why should the Democrats concede until they’re absolutely sure the result is correct?
"If I win, that will be accepted. If I lose, that will be accepted"
Not slick, just honest. Which to be fair is an alien concept for you so it's not surprising you don't understand it.
So, having finally had the time to watch it I have to ask you; what did he do that was "misogynistic"...?I don't think Harris needed to massacre Pence to be fair. He showed himself up for what he was last night, and pretty much put the final nail in the coffin on the majority of white, educated female vote at the election.
His antics on the podium last night exactly the kind of misogynistic bully boy behaviour that women have to deal with on a daily basis in workplaces all over the Western World, and the electorate have seen enough.
I think Harris just gave him enough rope to hang himself last night, and he dutifully obliged.
Does that make #45 a 'misogynist' against Biden, then??He ignored the moderator, butted in at every opportunity and constantly tried to talk over Harris.
You'll go to any lengths to find things that you can pretend are equivalent.Both parties are disenfranchising Americans in whatever Swing States they can.
Democratic Party have gotten the Green Party candidates kicked off ballots in Swing States amongst other acts.
Disenfranchising is a power thing not a particular party thing.
Pence's performance wasn't about dominating the political argument, it was about belittling Harris.So, having finally had the time to watch it I have to ask you; what did he do that was "misogynistic"...?
I found him quite courteous, actually, and not belittling as I thought he might be. Again, what he did he do to 'bully'? Debates are about being dominant in the political arena, so it's not the 'workplace' and a strange comparison. I wonder what you make of Nancy Pelosi in the case?
He absolutely skewered her on her own record as AG. It was painful to watch her pivot to something where the Dem Admin would try and undo the mess she and Biden created.
The debate did nothing for the challengers for the WH, but Pence chipped away at Harris' record, quite well. Her only recourse was to attack #45 as Pence clearly had nothing for her to attack in her head! Very strange!
In reality, Pence shaded this debate for impact.
Does that make #45 a 'misogynist' against Biden, then??
Pence's performance wasn't about dominating the political argument, it was about belittling Harris.
Trump v Biden was a tactic to try and make make Biden Stumble and appear to be cognitively impaired.
Sadly, you really don't have to go anywhere. It's blatantly being done. You should read @DrBlueBob last sentence to me. It would seem appropriate here :)You'll go to any lengths to find things that you can pretend are equivalent.
Did he say you're full of shit? That would seem very appropriate.Sadly, you really don't have to go anywhere. It's blatantly being done. You should read @DrBlueBob last sentence to me. It would seem appropriate here :)
Disenfranchising is a power thing not a particular party thing.
Physician, heal thyself. :-)Sadly, you really don't have to go anywhere. It's blatantly being done. You should read @DrBlueBob last sentence to me. It would seem appropriate here :)
Not my style. :-)Did he say you're full of shit? That would seem very appropriate.
Like I said, your Constitution is wank.Winning the popular vote is NOT a requirement of the constitution for nominating Judges. Winning the Electoral college is. And having an opening on the Court that needs filling while you are President.
This is self evident. Again, who made it easy to approve simple majority nominations?
I'll help you out. The same braintrust that now wants to increase
As I say, his moralising “I’m playing devils advocate” mask has slipped. He know his team is 4-1 down with five minutes to play and whilst it’s not over, he’s fucking gutted and is willing to blame the ref, the lino, var, FFP or whatever else to make himself feel better.You'll go to any lengths to find things that you can pretend are equivalent.
I'm not watching it, but if Pence dragged out that she's not that Progressive, doesn't that make a nonsense of Republican claims that they're all closet communists?Belittling as much as Tulsi Gabbard did in pointing her extremely dubious record.
She's not as 'Progressive' as she claims and Pence dragged that out into the light.
If it were lies you'd interrupt and put that person right.
She had the chance to reply and chose to pivot away from that glare.
It was quite interesting to watch, actually.
I'm not watching it, but if Pence dragged out that she's not that Progressive, doesn't that make a nonsense of Republican claims that they're all closet communists?