Manchester33
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2012
- Messages
- 6,751
Great. Would be even better if they used a tiny fraction of those profits to freeze (or better, reduce) season ticket prices next season.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
2021-2022 Annual report - City post club record profits and revenues
- Thread starter M18CTID
- Start date
Not our fault they pay their worthless donkeys absolute fortunesAh, so it begins.
View attachment 60271
With every positive out of our club there will be half dozen or more articles but the what’s app group with there Bingo write up! The usual fake sponsor human rights players been paid offshore!
As night follows day there will be 100% the negative articles we can’t do any thing positive without FSG paying these kunts!
As night follows day there will be 100% the negative articles we can’t do any thing positive without FSG paying these kunts!
EL APACHE TEVEZ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 21,864
Are we MASSIVE yet ; )
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
Ah, that well known financial expert from RAWK! Hey clinical - please give us a blow by blow breakdown of our accounts and highlight all the bits and pieces you have an issue with. Take your time cunty bollocks....Ah, so it begins.
View attachment 60271
LangleyBlue1970
Well-Known Member
I hope we get the lowest ranked team in the draw later. I think Clinical will be crying onto his giro.Ah, that well known financial expert from RAWK! Hey clinical - please give us a blow by blow breakdown of our accounts and highlight all the bits and pieces you have an issue with. Take your time cunty bollocks....
Centurions
Well-Known Member
Shush, no one else is supposed to know about the "other" set of books.I still don’t get why RAWK are so worked up by the De Bruyne penalty??? Surely it helps them in their battle for eighth place with Fulham.
Anyway these accounts are false, they are backhanders and illegal sponsorship from well know Abu Dhabi based companies such as Puma. I know this because a Scouser on the internet told me so.
They could at least set up a clocking out system and give refunds to the late leavers.Great. Would be even better if they used a tiny fraction of those profits to freeze (or better, reduce) season ticket prices next season.
Saddleworth2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Jan 2014
- Messages
- 21,472
Sorry mate. My mistake. Hope your feeling a bit better :-)I was replying to Richards 30 re Simon Jordan
Oh completely. We are the model of FFP, after the gerrymandering imposition of the 2014 fine.You know we might all laugh about this but I actually feel for all FFP's drawbacks, it perhaps encouraged us to move towards sustainability quicker than originally intended. As a club, we should actually be held up as a FFP success story.
It’s still not fit for purpose though.
It’s original designed purpose was to ensure clubs were sustainable.
It’s original implemented purpose was to insulate and protect the cartel and stop investment driven clubs like City.
It’s now restricting most of the cartel clubs from digging out of their self created holes, whilst rewarding sustainable and forward thinking clubs.
… so I can see it being tweaked yet again, (as it was a few years ago, allowing United to spend more - can’t recall the specific, but it benefited only their ilk), to prop up the past.
Last edited: