He didn't really give a reason. He couldn't explain his actions in a rational way, and he did admit to that in a way, but the telling thing for me was him saying to the police at the scene just after the incident had occured he misjudged the speed he was travelling at and his brakes failed.What reason did the fella give for chasing them down in his car? Did the red mist descend and he couldn’t control himself?
The police engaged the services of a forensic traffic cop who worked out he'd hit the bike with the front of his car. Tell tale signs from his number plate were found on the rear of the bike, his car had mounted the pavement puncturing two tyres which caused him to lose control and slam into the side of a van.
I know this probably isn't a popular opinion, but while he was obviously feeling threatened when he was in his house, the threat had disappeared once the burglars had left, and he wanted some sort of revenge. Why else would he chase after them in his car if that wasn't his motive, and the evidence from the scene confirmed that.
We are all entitled to protect ourselves and our families in the confines of our homes, but once the perceived or actual threat moves outside, that defence changes and normal rules apply.
I didn't have a problem with the guy who knocked the two guys off the bike receiving a prison sentence because the intention of his actions was to hurt them. We've all seen clips of pedestrians being mown down by an enraged car driver because of some disagreement in a night club or wherever, and this was no different. The red mist descended, and he was going to have them.