As a newish consumer of City-related media, this may be obvious to everyone but me, but has there been a recent player who has divided opinion so starkly? Obviously on here it’s either he’s terrible or awesome. Player ratings from the last game were either he is the worst of every player on the field (including Brentford) or one of the better ones. One rating will say he provided lots of offensive opportunities, the other will say he provided no offensive value. I listened to two City podcasts today. One was: he’s a failure, doesn’t get it, won’t/shouldn't play the rest of the season. The other praised him for his unique skill set, talked about his potential, mentioned how he’s getting better every game (obviously discussed how he’s not perfect but generally positive). Maybe Grealish was similar in terms of opinion?
I’d stop listening to the first podcast. It sounds shite.As a newish consumer of City-related media, this may be obvious to everyone but me, but has there been a recent player who has divided opinion so starkly? Obviously on here it’s either he’s terrible or awesome. Player ratings from the last game were either he is the worst of every player on the field (including Brentford) or one of the better ones. One rating will say he provided lots of offensive opportunities, the other will say he provided no offensive value. I listened to two City podcasts today. One was: he’s a failure, doesn’t get it, won’t/shouldn't play the rest of the season. The other praised him for his unique skill set, talked about his potential, mentioned how he’s getting better every game (obviously discussed how he’s not perfect but generally positive). Maybe Grealish was similar in terms of opinion?
Not saying this is the case with you, but I keep seeing this trotted out like it’s a big knock against him. We already had five of the best defenders in the world before he joined - of course if it gets down to the wire you’re going to play those who have more experience in the system. I don’t think this is necessarily a sign he won’t succeed here.
The podcast is from what I think is a local Manchester paper (I’m not from UK). what I find most irritating is how they kind of question why Pep is playing him - and playing him as a LB. I don’t get bothered when regular people on this forum question it, but it seems like lazy journalism for journalists to just say “wtf is going on.” Pep has seen Joško make mistakes, just like we have, but he’s still playing him. So as a journalist, maybe think about what that means - ask Pep what the plan is, look back to see what Pep has done with other players to make a guess about what the long term plan is, look at his positive skills and figure how they might align with Peps goals that particular game. There is more insightful commentary here and I assume most don’t have the behind the scenes access as most journalists.I’d stop listening to the first podcast. It sounds shite.
He’s by no means the finished product but anybody not seeing his quality and potential in this team is likely taking too many drugs.