47 | Phil Foden - 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ah I had no idea that you spoke for the majority! Good to know. Even then the majority have been fed one narrative and will happily parrot what they hear a commentator or a pundit says as fact without questioning it. As a city fan you should know that.
The fuck do you think you are that your word is gospel and that if anyone disagrees, it’s because they’ve been fed a media narrative? Jesus, take a day off. We disagree, the majority of the posts in here post match also disagree with you. Deal with it.
 
Distracted ffs potentially 2 up
A football game has a 10000 different moments, it's too easy to do counter narratives and laser focus on one thing. Haaland also had a couple of chances that he might have put away, and every game is going to have half chances where players can do a couple of things and if they don't score it looks wrong. The point is we scored three yesterday, which should be enough to win any game of football, but we conceded three with obvious patterns of play. That to me is more worrying.
 
the point is at 2up we would have took the wind out of their sales , it’s that simple . Was a great game but we should of put it to bed then imo .
 
The fuck do you think you are that your word is gospel and that if anyone disagrees, it’s because they’ve been fed a media narrative? Jesus, take a day off. We disagree, the majority of the posts in here post match also disagree with you. Deal with it.

Ha! Amazing. Mate, you've just said i'm over inflating my own view when you literally just made it out that you speak for the majority. Come on. You're still at with the 'we' stuff too! Can you let me know who this 'we' is?

You disagree, sure, but you literally do not speak for blues. Nor do I. It's your take. That's fine, but don't act like some posts on here are representative, hold any power or make your view truthful. It's obviously an over simplification. People love a fucking moan, we all know this. Of course some disgruntled people are gonna come here and moan. It's all most people use this forum for.

I'm not saying im right, cos you all might be, but unsurprisingly some pissed off posts on here doesn't prove anything. By that reasoning it makes Pep actually overrated and a fraud without money because most of red cafe and rawk think he is, which is obviously bullshit. Popular opinion isnt always a right one. I'm fine with that, cos that's life.

Anyway, away from that nonsense. The Foden debate reminds me of the Haaland moment vs Bayern.

Fawn5dpWQAI8agj.jpeg

Fawn5rsX0AA-sAe.jpegFawn532XEAA2QCC.jpegFawn6CoXkAAdq5_.jpeg

He decided to pass. If he'd shot he'd have got his shot off and the defender wouldn't have been able to stop it. The defender was *miles* off him but slowing down to take the pass, and the angle the ball had to travel, meant it was cut out. Passing and wrapping your foot down around it can slow you down and give the defender a better chance. I'm convinced that Foden attempting to cut it back *could*, not definitely, cos i cant prove it, but could have been cut out. Really reasonable chance it could have been IMO, cos we've seen it a tonne over the years and got frustrated by a City player choosing to try and pass it there and not put their laces through it. I don't think it was even close to an egregious mistake and i reckon everyone has made a huge mountain out of a molehill.
 
Ah I had no idea that you spoke for the majority! Good to know. Even then the majority have been fed one narrative and will happily parrot what they hear a commentator or a pundit says as fact without questioning it. As a city fan you should know that.
Pep certainly wasn't particularly happy. Phil should have passed. Two in two games.
 
the point is at 2up we would have took the wind out of their sales , it’s that simple . Was a great game but we should of put it to bed then imo .
I thought KDBs shot straight at the keeper in similar circumstances where Haaland was coming in at the back post was very similar but I've not read post after post digging him out for it (which is good BTW)
 
Pep certainly wasn't particularly happy. Phil should have passed. Two in two games.

I'm not sure Pep's views, 50 yards away, from a touchline angle, are anything other than frustration that we wasted an opportunity. I'm sure it doesn't mean that Foden got it absolutely wrong. Maybe he did, but even Pep would be the first to admit that he'd need to watch something back before judging something. It's only fair.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.