Hart of the Matter
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2011
- Messages
- 5,180
Says more about you than the original poster then. It's obvious.I'm not convinced that makes an ounce of sense
Says more about you than the original poster then. It's obvious.I'm not convinced that makes an ounce of sense
Sterling will have a better big chance per minute ratio (as in more minutes pass per big chance he misses) than Edin or Jesus, due to the fact Sterling has played considerably more minutes in both the league and for City.I'm not convinced that makes an ounce of sense
Sterling will have a better big chance per minute ratio (as in more minutes pass per big chance he misses) than Edin or Jesus, due to the fact Sterling has played considerably more minutes in both the league and for City.
Says more about you than the original poster then. It's obvious.
Yeah I know that.No, that's not what 'per minute' means. Unless you're claiming that Sergio having the best Goals per Minute ratio in PL history is irrelevant because he's played more minutes than Kane.
Yeah, but it's obvious the point being made.Not at all- that's not what 'per minute' means.
We don't half overcomplicate things sometimes... for Jesus ' goal, great finishers would just have scored direct from de Bruyne's pass, or else scored from the pass from Jesus with his left foot.
I do like football and I like both Sterling and Jesus, but they didn't half faff around in the box for that goal.Methinks you are having a little dig at Sterling here bobo.
Do you like football ?
I do like football and I like both Sterling and Jesus, but they didn't half faff around in the box for that goal.