9/11 - More evidence it was set up by people in the shadows

[Lucky13]

What is thermite?

 

[TCIB]

Hey bud its a very volotile compound that burns at an extreme high heat, made from metals (most common is iron oxide and aluminium but theoretically you can use other metals) and is a highly restricted substance, i sometimes make it at work when im bored shitless hehe xD

Edit: just fyi its used to cut through metals mainly as the extreme heat it gives cuts through metal/steel/iron like a knife through butter.

 

[Lucky13]

i've heard that before , is that what your saying took the towers down?

 

[Skashion]

Now, move on to... time travel

I'd suggest you get yourself a better example of conspiracy theory.

 

[BulgarianPride]

I have a question, how fast did the towers collapse?

 

[TCIB]

I think it had a major effect on it yes, basically in demolitions you have 2 charges at a set point.

1, A Cutter (thermite in this case)
2, A "kicker" which would push or "kick" the weight bearing girder out of place.

With regards to the twin towers my thougts vary to the norm as the kicker is innitiated after the cutter (usually you innitite the cutter then the kicker).

I dont claim this to be the truth, this is just physics speaking here and chemistry and in my mind this is what i personally believe.

@Bulgarianpride if memory serves 9.6 seconds which eqauted freefall speeds i.e. nothing interupting the collapse which indicates skilled demolitions.

 

[Lucky13]

I think it had a major effect on it yes, basically in demolitions you have 2 charges at a set point.

1, A Cutter (thermite in this case)
2, A "kicker" which would push or "kick" the weight bearing girder out of place.

With regards to the twin towers my thougts vary to the norm as the kicker is innitiated after the cutter (usually you innitite the cutter then the kicker).

I dont claim this to be the truth, this is just physics speaking here and chemistry and in my mind this is what i personally believe.

@Bulgarianpride if memory serves 9.6 seconds which eqauted freefall speeds i.e. nothing interupting the collapse which indicates skilled demolitions.

So do you believe that the charges and cuts were done before the planes hit the towers ?

Or.

How long after the planes hit did the towers fall and would that have been long enough to set the charges and do the cuts?

 

[TCIB]

The charges which in this case was thermite paint were done a couple of weeks prior when unscheduled maintenance happened and 100's of employees were refused entrance to areas they would usually be allowed access to, this info is varified by hundreds of people who worked at the towers, and easily found all over the net all ostories say the same, even from people who had minimal contact with each other

Areas were sealed of whilst teams gained access to the service tunnels or whatever you would call them (the areas where the weight bearing beams and girders were exposed).

This "painting" thus occured Employees when they asked questions were basically told to shut up and do their job.

 

[BulgarianPride]

I think it had a major effect on it yes, basically in demolitions you have 2 charges at a set point.

1, A Cutter (thermite in this case)
2, A "kicker" which would push or "kick" the weight bearing girder out of place.

With regards to the twin towers my thougts vary to the norm as the kicker is innitiated after the cutter (usually you innitite the cutter then the kicker).

I dont claim this to be the truth, this is just physics speaking here and chemistry and in my mind this is what i personally believe.

@Bulgarianpride if memory serves 9.6 seconds which eqauted freefall speeds i.e. nothing interupting the collapse which indicates skilled demolitions.

Free fall time is 9.17s.

If they collapsed on by the weight of the top, it shouldn't happen that fast (9.6s). Should it? If a building is to collapse from it's own weight, how long does that take?

Does it take time for the support beams at lower levels to break? If so how much time? Those buildings were obviously designed to support at least their own weight. So if it indeed took 9.6s for them to collapse, how is it possible? That would mean they feel with an acceleration of 8.96 m/ss.

I am not a structural engineer so don't know if these numbers are normal. I am just asking before someone accuses me of conspiracies. .

 

[TCIB]

Hey bud don't appologise its your right to ask questions :D

I will look for the video now matey it has a boffin mathematician explaining that the dynamics involved show the weight + speed of collapse vs the structural design and composition of materials = a near perfect freefall.

I just want to stress like you i am not a conspiracy nut, hell im one of the first to look at facts and dispel the falsities.