9 | Erling Haaland - 2023/24

Moss Side's Finest said:
Some people in here need to take a long hard look in a mirror and then slap yourself senseless. We have the best striker possibly to ever have graced the planet and yet here you are

I agree, teams have adapted. However, if you count, in almost every game there are numerous opportunities to play killer through balls (as Haaland is always moving around). Why we don't use these opportunities with the passers we have is astounding. It almost looks like they are intentionally trying to exclude him from the game. It's bizarre
Click to expand...
Yeah, guys like Pele, Baggio, Van Basten, Ronaldo Nazario, Romario... have nothing on this guy Haaland.

Heck just this decade we had Benzema, Aguero, Lewandowski, Mbappe, Ibra and Suarez. All of them superior forwards to what Haaland has shown so far, and capable of creating their own goals. Especially in the case of Benzema, Mbappe, Aguero and Suarez, they could have 10/10 games even without scoring, thanks to their creativity, dribbling, passing, link up play....
 
Can't think of another striker that occupies 2/3 defenders every game in and around the box. There is a reason for that it's because teams are shit scared of him. He's not an all round forward he's an out and out poacher/goalscorer. He's doing a fantastic job for us occupying defenders while making space for others to play in. If he's good enough for pep he's good enough for me sure he can improve aspects of his game and I'm 100% sure he will at us. Also think that injury was worse than made out and he's struggling to get back to full fitness.
 
There are a number of reasons for Haaland not scoring, probably the biggest is Pep playing him deeper, another is second season, another is his main provider not playing or scoring himself, but probably the biggest is, he is a big lad and the refs have adjusted their view of the rules, when he fouls they blow but they do not when he is fouled, the lad is going to have to learn to dive, can you imagine Haaland throwing him self to the flow, every time someone touches him on the shoulder.
 
city warrior said:
Yeah, guys like Pele, Baggio, Van Basten, Ronaldo Nazario, Romario... have nothing on this guy Haaland.

Heck just this decade we had Benzema, Aguero, Lewandowski, Mbappe, Ibra and Suarez. All of them superior forwards to what Haaland has shown so far, and capable of creating their own goals. Especially in the case of Benzema, Mbappe, Aguero and Suarez, they could have 10/10 games even without scoring, thanks to their creativity, dribbling, passing, link up play....
Click to expand...
I will stick with Haaland, since those are crocked now and Mbappe is a winger with no linkup play at all, you might as well of said Rashford or Ings, Lewandoski just had his record broken by Kane, all strikers have their weaknesses, it is down to the team to patch them up, so when someone says Haaland had 28 touches that is down to the team not making sure he has 50.
 
Quick question to the Uber-cool Haaland Haters.

Who would you replace him with?
How much would that player cost?
How much would you expect to receive for a fraud like big Erl? £20m. £30m tops, yeah?
Why do you think the greatest manager in the entire history of the game keeps picking him?
Is Pep shit too?

Okay, they were actually several questions. Answers on a postcard, addressed to:

Mr Fuck off you entitled pricks,
#1 You’re thick as fuck Avenue,
Little Hamptons,
City are a giant now, get used to it-shire.
 
Kazzydeyna said:
Apparently we’d be better off with Troy Deeney. Yep, somebody actually wrote that.
Click to expand...
I didn’t say we’d be better I said if all you want is for a striker to occupy the defenders we may as well have deeney. To praise a striker for occupying a cb is absolutely laughable tbh.

Whether you like it or not haaland isn’t playing well at the moment. it’s ok to point that out
 
Kazzydeyna said:
Quick question to the Uber-cool Haaland Haters.

Who would you replace him with?
How much would that player cost?
How much would you expect to receive for a fraud like big Erl? £20m. £30m tops, yeah?
Why do you think the greatest manager in the entire history of the game keeps picking him?
Is Pep shit too?

Okay, they were actually several questions. Answers on a postcard, addressed to:

Mr Fuck off you entitled pricks,
#1 You’re thick as fuck Avenue,
Little Hamptons,
City are a giant now, get used to it-shire.
Click to expand...
Talk about an over reaction or a wumming session , lol
 
Kazzydeyna said:
Quick question to the Uber-cool Haaland Haters.

Who would you replace him with?
How much would that player cost?
How much would you expect to receive for a fraud like big Erl? £20m. £30m tops, yeah?
Why do you think the greatest manager in the entire history of the game keeps picking him?
Is Pep shit too?

Okay, they were actually several questions. Answers on a postcard, addressed to:

Mr Fuck off you entitled pricks,
#1 You’re thick as fuck Avenue,
Little Hamptons,
City are a giant now, get used to it-shire.
Click to expand...
I still maintain Kane would have been the better buy but he obviously wasn’t available at that point. Put him in our team and he would similar numbers to haaland as well as huge assist numbers. Kane also is better in the build up, better in the air and has a better passing range.

If you play on the counter there is probably no better striker than haaland. How we play there are better options for us imo
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.