A brief glimpse of God and Creation

buzzer1 said:
I have'nt had much to say on this thread as some of the quotes are over my head, but yet again Bluemoon does'nt disappoint.

Pauldominic has answered every single question that was aimed at him, some a little belated and as far as i can see there is only Paul and Uwerosler that have been if you like "Bombarded", it is fair enough to put eachothers points across and rigorously scrutinize one belief to the next, but Paul has'nt deserved some of the namecalling and aggression that this thread has thrown up, thick skin or not,it is'nt nice guys, that is all.

See mate, that's rubbish. PD has dodged most questions and most points, instead preferring to ramble on to his own agenda. Besides this, when he tries to cast aspersion on scientific discovery by trying to link evolution to child abuse (without even putting up a defence about this), then he's behaving in a twattish manner.
 
Damocles said:
buzzer1 said:
I have'nt had much to say on this thread as some of the quotes are over my head, but yet again Bluemoon does'nt disappoint.

Pauldominic has answered every single question that was aimed at him, some a little belated and as far as i can see there is only Paul and Uwerosler that have been if you like "Bombarded", it is fair enough to put eachothers points across and rigorously scrutinize one belief to the next, but Paul has'nt deserved some of the namecalling and aggression that this thread has thrown up, thick skin or not,it is'nt nice guys, that is all.

See mate, that's rubbish. PD has dodged most questions and most points, instead preferring to ramble on to his own agenda. Besides this, when he tries to cast aspersion on scientific discovery by trying to link evolution to child abuse (without even putting up a defence about this), then he's behaving in a twattish manner.

And uwerosler is just a bad WUM.
 
Damocles said:
pauldominic said:
Utter Bollocks Damocles.

Evolution also provides an explanation for altruism and altruistic behaviour.

Exactly. You state a truism. That because the species evolve by the process of evolution, everything the species does has a root cause of that process. It's like saying that parents are responsible for the behaviour of their children BECAUSE they produced them, thus without those parents, the child would not exist.

It truly staggers me that after hundreds of pages of attempting to explain I should be on the receiving end of this kind of post.

The current line of questioning was about the [bad thing] not about altruism and charity.

Please tell me where I have been "dishonest in both principle and in belief".

Because in an argument about child abuse, you try to "blame" a process as a consequence for it. Aa you previously mentioned, evolution is responsible for EVERYTHING THAT EXISTS, EVER EXISTED, EVER WILL EXIST, HAS EVER HAPPENED, WILL EVER HAPPEN, HAS EVER BEEN THOUGHT, CONSIDERED, CONCEIVED, ACTED UPON, OPERATED OR EXECUTED.


When you use this ridiculous guilt by association, it lowers the tone of the argument. You are implicitly making the connection; child abuse = bad, evolution = child abuse, evolution = bad. Which is intellectually dishonest and downright silly.

Here are some other things that child abuse are a consequence of, under YOUR broad generalisation:

Child abuse is a consequence of existence.
Child abuse is a consequence of the Universe
Child abuse is a consequence of parents.
Child abuse is a consequence of having children.
Child abuse is a consequence of having gentalia.
Child abuse is a consequence of development of the mind.
Child abuse is a consequence of religion.
Child abuse is a consequence of multi-cellular life.
Child abuse is a consequence of Western attitudes towards sex.
Child abuse is a consequence of the illegality of child abuse.

All of the above are true in your definition that you include evolution within. Why not go up to a parent and tell them that it is their fault that their child was abused, because they had a child in the first place. This is essentially what your "consequence of evolution" bullshit said.

You're entirely correct about Jesus being a progressive individual, but I have no idea how you think that Christians are morally superior to anyone. That is a complete misunderstanding of Christianity.

Yes, I often find that the people who know the least about Christianity are the Christians.

Its also ridiculous to assume that "Christians are Christian as a way to feel superior to others".

No it isn't. Religious people, by their very nature, look down upon unbelievers. They are "lost sheep" who must hear the "Good News", because only you guys know "the Truth" and "the Word of Lord" because you are "God's chosen people" who are "created in the image of Him".

Yeah, that's not patronising at all.

Believe it or not, evolution is a *Scientific* process. It has no inherent morality whatsoever.

Religious people very very definitely do not look down on fellow human beings.

The equals sign is a dangerous one and I would advise less use of it.

Have you completely forgotten what I posted in the atheist /agnostic thread about emergent properties and complexity?

The reference to over generalisation sounds like Matthew 5: -

1 Now when Jesus saw the crowds, he went up on a mountainside and sat down. His disciples came to him, 2 and he began to teach them.
The Beatitudes
He said:

3 “Blessed are the poor in spirit,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
4 Blessed are those who mourn,
for they will be comforted.
5 Blessed are the meek,
for they will inherit the earth.
6 Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
for they will be filled.
7 Blessed are the merciful,
for they will be shown mercy.
8 Blessed are the pure in heart,
for they will see God.
9 Blessed are the peacemakers,
for they will be called children of God.
10 Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

11 “Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12 Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.
Salt and Light
13 “You are the salt of the earth. But if the salt loses its saltiness, how can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled underfoot.

14 “You are the light of the world. A town built on a hill cannot be hidden. 15 Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. 16 In the same way, let your light shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father in heaven.
The Fulfillment of the Law
17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18 For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. 19 Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20 For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.
Murder
21 “You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘You shall not murder,[a] and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment.’ 22 But I tell you that anyone who is angry with a brother or sister[c] will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to a brother or sister, ‘Raca,’[d] is answerable to the court. And anyone who says, ‘You fool!’ will be in danger of the fire of hell.

23 “Therefore, if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother or sister has something against you, 24 leave your gift there in front of the altar. First go and be reconciled to them; then come and offer your gift.

25 “Settle matters quickly with your adversary who is taking you to court. Do it while you are still together on the way, or your adversary may hand you over to the judge, and the judge may hand you over to the officer, and you may be thrown into prison. 26 Truly I tell you, you will not get out until you have paid the last penny.
Adultery
27 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’[e] 28 But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart. 29 If your right eye causes you to stumble, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. 30 And if your right hand causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell.
Divorce
31 “It has been said, ‘Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce.’[f] 32 But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, makes her the victim of adultery, and anyone who marries a divorced woman commits adultery.
Oaths
33 “Again, you have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘Do not break your oath, but fulfill to the Lord the vows you have made.’ 34 But I tell you, do not swear an oath at all: either by heaven, for it is God’s throne; 35 or by the earth, for it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King. 36 And do not swear by your head, for you cannot make even one hair white or black. 37 All you need to say is simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything beyond this comes from the evil one.[g]
Eye for Eye
38 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’[h] 39 But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. 40 And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. 41 If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles. 42 Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.
Love for Enemies
43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 46 If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? 47 And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? 48 Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.
 
No it isn't. Religious people, by their very nature, look down upon unbelievers. They are "lost sheep" who must hear the "Good News", because only you guys know "the Truth" and "the Word of Lord" because you are "God's chosen people" who are "created in the image of Him".

Yeah, that's not patronising at all.

People very their very nature! Football fans look down on other football fans, people of politics look down on those of different opinion, tis human nature I am afraid, just because you are religious it does not exempt you from the normal fallibilities of the human race, now the trick is to transcend the normal ego reactions, what a wonderful world it would be.

As an aside some of the religious debate on here is just one side mirror imaging the other, people call the religious for preaching, yet preach their own creed, people say religion is intolerant yet appear to be intolerant of anyone who holds a different opinion.

We can mock and name call, but beliefs are very strong and personal to each individual, and on this particular topic I bid my farewell, it all gets rather circular in the end
 
pauldominic said:
Believe it or not, evolution is a *Scientific* process. It has no inherent morality whatsoever.

Religious people very very definitely do not look down on fellow human beings.

The equals sign is a dangerous one and I would advise less use of it.

Have you completely forgotten what I posted in the atheist /agnostic thread about emergent properties and complexity?

Basically you could have saved precious DB space by just saying "I disagree" and leaving it at that.

Oh, and I'm pretty sure that I don't need a lecture from you on scientific principles, nor on what the equals sign means.

I also want you know that I didn't read your excerpt from Matthew 5 just as I presume that you wouldn't read an excerpt that I post from DiscWorld. They have the same relevance to the discussion; namely none.

-- Tue May 31, 2011 8:16 pm --

Ducado said:
People very their very nature! Football fans look down on other football fans, people of politics look down on those of different opinion, tis human nature I am afraid, just because you are religious it does not exempt you from the normal fallibilities of the human race, now the trick is to transcend the normal ego reactions, what a wonderful world it would be.

Perhaps, but we haven't built a global organisation based upon our idea that we're better than other people.<br /><br />-- Tue May 31, 2011 8:17 pm --<br /><br />
Ducado said:
People very their very nature! Football fans look down on other football fans, people of politics look down on those of different opinion, tis human nature I am afraid, just because you are religious it does not exempt you from the normal fallibilities of the human race, now the trick is to transcend the normal ego reactions, what a wonderful world it would be.

Perhaps, but we haven't built a global organisation based upon our idea that we're better than other people.
 
Damocles said:
buzzer1 said:
I have'nt had much to say on this thread as some of the quotes are over my head, but yet again Bluemoon does'nt disappoint.

Pauldominic has answered every single question that was aimed at him, some a little belated and as far as i can see there is only Paul and Uwerosler that have been if you like "Bombarded", it is fair enough to put eachothers points across and rigorously scrutinize one belief to the next, but Paul has'nt deserved some of the namecalling and aggression that this thread has thrown up, thick skin or not,it is'nt nice guys, that is all.

See mate, that's rubbish. PD has dodged most questions and most points, instead preferring to ramble on to his own agenda. Besides this, when he tries to cast aspersion on scientific discovery by trying to link evolution to child abuse (without even putting up a defence about this), then he's behaving in a twattish manner.

^^^ plus i understand what you are saying regs the questions, i really do but WHATEVER belief anyone has it still DOES NOT give anybody the right to get personal, i know nobody is exempt from criticism but ffs, no need for the personal shit mate.

Skash, see above mate, that is all i was saying.
 
Ducado said:
No it isn't. Religious people, by their very nature, look down upon unbelievers. They are "lost sheep" who must hear the "Good News", because only you guys know "the Truth" and "the Word of Lord" because you are "God's chosen people" who are "created in the image of Him".

Yeah, that's not patronising at all.

People very their very nature! Football fans look down on other football fans, people of politics look down on those of different opinion, tis human nature I am afraid, just because you are religious it does not exempt you from the normal fallibilities of the human race, now the trick is to transcend the normal ego reactions, what a wonderful world it would be.

As an aside some of the religious debate on here is just one side mirror imaging the other, people call the religious for preaching, yet preach their own creed, people say religion is intolerant yet appear to be intolerant of anyone who holds a different opinion.

We can mock and name call, but beliefs are very strong and personal to each individual, and on this particular topic I bid my farewell, it all gets rather circular in the end
The problems with evolution are.....?
 
the problem with evolution is the evolution of intelligence and understanding.

religion is based on explaining the inexplicable before we became intelligent enough to understand it.

"what's that bright disc in the night sky? - it must be a god and needs worshipping"

"whats that bright disc in the night sky? - it must be cheese"

"what's that disc in the night sky? - oh, it's the moon - it must have been created by God"

"what's that bright disc in the night sky? - oh its the moon, we landed there last week (alegedly) and it's really a chunk of rock and dust, though it does influence the movement of water around our planet depending upon how close it is during it's orbit and is on it's orbit due to it's velocity under the influence of the earth's gravitational pull"

"what's that bright disc in the night sky? - it's a blue moon, for manchester city has risen from the dead - it is a true miracle"

etc......
 
SWP's back said:
Ducado said:
No it isn't. Religious people, by their very nature, look down upon unbelievers. They are "lost sheep" who must hear the "Good News", because only you guys know "the Truth" and "the Word of Lord" because you are "God's chosen people" who are "created in the image of Him".

Yeah, that's not patronising at all.

People very their very nature! Football fans look down on other football fans, people of politics look down on those of different opinion, tis human nature I am afraid, just because you are religious it does not exempt you from the normal fallibilities of the human race, now the trick is to transcend the normal ego reactions, what a wonderful world it would be.

As an aside some of the religious debate on here is just one side mirror imaging the other, people call the religious for preaching, yet preach their own creed, people say religion is intolerant yet appear to be intolerant of anyone who holds a different opinion.

We can mock and name call, but beliefs are very strong and personal to each individual, and on this particular topic I bid my farewell, it all gets rather circular in the end
The problems with evolution are.....?

a question...

have you PM'd him?

if not, go and do so and take this repetivity with you.

If you have, Ducado give him the decency of a reply, or hold your hands up and go "mate, I've got it wrong, sorry".
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.