So at 15 you're still a child and can be easily influenced but, a few months later, at 16 you're not? My point is that yes she was legally a child but only legally. Whether or not we can actually class her as a child who is too young to have sex is a different topic that cealry different countries differ about.
I understand his point but there's a difference between a lack of law and differences of law. The fact that there are differences regarding the legal age to have sex is enough to highlight that it isn't objective and that she was actually a child.
Looks like the PR team got on the phone to them then as they changed it.Just watched SSN. He was first story on. No coverage of him playing football, just a brief summing up of the offences he's pleaded guilty and not guilty to. They did mention that he plays for Sunderland following his transfer from Manchester City in 2012.
Plenty of countries make bestiality legal. Germany only made it illegal last year I remember seeing on the news.That isn't morally ambigious though, is it? That's what I'm saying. By the fact that no countries or socieities legalise beastiality or necrophelia is clear indication that there is something unarguably wrong with those acts. The fact that the age of having sex differs all over the world including in our continient means it is clearly up for debate that you it isn't.
What the fuck are you drinking mate? You cannot be serious at all, please tell me you arent.No it's not the same. It may be the same offence based on our legal system, but it clearly isn't the same. Driving at 77mph makes you a dangerous person on the road, driving at 33mph makes you rather careless. Johnson is an idiot as you've stated, but I wouldn't class him as vile person as others have.
So at 15 you're still a child and can be easily influenced but, a few months later, at 16 you're not? My point is that yes she was legally a child but only legally. Whether or not we can actually class her as a child who is too young to have sex is a different topic that cealry different countries differ about.
I understand his point but there's a difference between a lack of law and differences of law. The fact that there are differences regarding the legal age to have sex is enough to highlight that it isn't objective and that she was actually a child.
If my understanding is correct you can have sex with a person under the age of 16 if you are not older than 18? I do not think this law was made so horny men in their 20s and upwards can start proposing children. I think the law dealt with the reality of 15 year olds having 17 year old boyfriends which is very rational. What you are defending is an adult well past his 20s who has a partner as well as resources that would allow him access to the finest women in the world should knowingly persue a child and groom her into sexual acts. This is fine because in Germsny a 15 year old can legally have sex with her 17 year old boyfriend? There is something wrong with a mind that even tries to defend this.
The first reaction of any "normal" adult is disgust so the fact that you are able to find wiggle room to normalise this behaviour and cite foreign laws makes think there is personal intrest in this for you. When I think of who I want in my bed I'm not thinking of someone with 1D posters on their wall and was born 3 years before Facebook was formed. He is a pedophile because he is attracted to minors.