You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Additional time
- Thread starter east2
- Start date
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
im on of the biggest critics of time wasting but it's up to the ref to move the game along during play not oh ill add 10 minutes to the end all good. Yesterday Timber lost his boot wanted game stopped a freindly city kicked it out then we had to wait while he retrived his boot then slowly retie them. once picked boot up the game shouldve restarted enough time wasted strolling back for boot
Last edited:
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
if enforced at city we'll be playing 5 men most games i cant see it being enforcedRe your last paragraph. I totally agree and was pleased to see the first three bookings for kicking the ball away and Artetas rant demanding a yellow card.
Would not sop the clock every time the ball goes out, but if a throw takes longer than say 10 seconds , then you add time on for the excess. Timekeeper would most likely be needed. Agree need to be careful where we take all this or we will end up with bloody quarters and time outs before too long.That would make the game go on for around 30-40 minutes longer than it currently does.
City had the highest average time in play last season with 60 minutes. Newcastle the lowest with 51 minutes.
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
personally i think VAR was timekeeper yesterday ! . just how did matterface know after walkers injury how long to minute did he know was going to be added on unless toldWould not sop the clock every time the ball goes out, but if a throw takes longer than say 10 seconds , then you add time on for the excess. Timekeeper would most likely be needed. Agree need to be careful where we take all this or we will end up with bloody quarters and time outs before too long.
BlueMonkey79
Well-Known Member
It will all be based on momentum. If we are cruising to a 3 nil win, the added time will be a standard 1 or 2 minutes. If we are winning by one goal and the other team are showing an initiative, the added time will be 6 plus.No idea we will find out these season as in a team winning just 1-0=what added time?! To a team winning 2+ goals!
I hope when we at home we are 5 nil up we get 8 mins plus if we don't it's all a fix do what you want as per usual method
True. If thats the case already and how they are going to implement it then think we need see an extra time clock that shows the aggregate time being added as we go along transparently.personally i think VAR was timekeeper yesterday ! . just how did matterface know after walkers injury how long to minute did he know was going to be added on unless told
It will all be based on momentum. If we are cruising to a 3 nil win, the added time will be a standard 1 or 2 minutes. If we are winning by one goal and the other team are showing an initiative, the added time will be 6 plus.
Well that is bent then it shouldn't matter if a team are winning 6-0 or 1-0 the time added should be the same
Kippax Street 1880
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Mar 2010
- Messages
- 5,034
The problem for us was that we shouldn`t have been in a position to be "clinging on".Instead we seemed in the latter stages to tell Arsenal to "bring it on".
I think we're just a bit short of fitness. The last 15 minutes of both halves we looked leggy. That was a great runout yesterday in terms of preparation I felt, just a sickener to lose in that manner but it is just a friendly.
Millwallawayveteran1988
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Sep 2010
- Messages
- 38,485
Imagine how empty our stadium would be if we are winning 3-0 and they add 10 mins!Well that is bent then it shouldn't matter if a team are winning 6-0 or 1-0 the time added should be the same