Rammyblues
Well-Known Member
IMO if he goes to Spurs and they get 4th place at the expense of the rags all well and good. :-)
sbm said:I would like to be reassured that UEFA would not deem this to be an attempt to get round the FFP rules. But if is a fact - and not just your opinion - then it is decisive for me (given the absence of other suitors).sniff said:I lose a little faith in common sense every time i read this thread....
Some people need to stop giving opinion as fact, or correct..
In simple terms even paying half of Ade's wage bill will be great for our FFP forecast.
His wage's do not count against us because his deal was in 2010, but the loan fee and the % of salary they pay will all be classed as income. So £5m wage saving + the £2m fee, £7m towards FFP compliance.... It really is that simple, and what the entire deal is about.
Forget helping Tottenham, if they are still our rival then we are in trouble.
Manchester_City_Blue said:Personally I'd offer a better deal to a club abroad, would rather not pay £100,000 a week to help spurs.
let him rot in the reservesBlueJill said:Manchester_City_Blue said:Personally I'd offer a better deal to a club abroad, would rather not pay £100,000 a week to help spurs.
And when Ade said no, what would you do then?
cityboy1 said:let him rot in the reservesBlueJill said:Manchester_City_Blue said:Personally I'd offer a better deal to a club abroad, would rather not pay £100,000 a week to help spurs.
And when Ade said no, what would you do then?
As if, why would we bother?SWP's back said:Ian Ladyman saying city won't be paying ANY of his wages. Not. A. Penny
SWP's back said:Ian Ladyman saying city won't be paying ANY of his wages. Not. A. Penny