Adebayor to Spurs

Players id take in exchange:
Bale
Modric
Van der Vaart
Sandro
Lennon
Dawson.
Townsend + £££
Rose + £££
Huddlestone + £££
 
kun said:
Players id take in exchange:
Bale
Modric
Van der Vaart
Sandro
Lennon
Dawson.
Townsend + £££
Rose + £££
Huddlestone + £££

Yeah, Tottenham have actually got a competent squad. Their main attacking outlet (in the one trick center forward that is crouch) is so encumbering!
 
Manchester City are ready to let Emmanuel Adebayor join Tottenham on a free transfer.

Two years after spending £25million to recruit the striker from Arsenal, the richest club in the world want to ditch the Togo striker and shed his £170,000-a-week wages.

But even on a free transfer, Spurs will shy away from a permanent deal. They are content to take ­Adebayor on loan, with City subsidising the bulk of the 27 year-old’s wages.

Over the next three years Adebayor’s wages will cost City around £30m.

City are also refusing to pay around £3m in agents fees and that’s why Samir Nasri’s £25m recruitment from Arsenal has stalled.

The clubs agreed the transfer fee and Nasri ­accepted City’s offer of a five-year deal worth £180,000-a-week.

But Sunday Mirror Sport understands that City broke off negotiations when it became clear that Nasri’s advisers wanted paying for making the deal happen.

Sources at the club last night insisted that the move could still take place.

But they have told Nasri and his advisers that they will not pay agency fees on top of a premium ­transfer fee and wages.

Nasri, who has turned down Arsenal’s offer of a new contract worth £90,000-a-week, featured in the Gunners side ­beaten 2-0 by Liverpool at The Emirates yesterday.

Adebayor is in danger of being frozen out of City’s plans and needs to escape the Eitihad Stadium.

Spurs boss Harry ­Redknapp said: “It in the hands of the chairman. I spoke to him some time ago about Adebayor and I would like to bring him to White Hart Lane if we can do a deal with City. But it would only be on loan.”

Spurs have a wage cap that has not exceeded £65,000 for several years and prevents them from even entertaining taking Adebayor on a permanent deal.
 
They are content to take ­Adebayor on loan, with City subsidising the bulk of the 27 year-old’s wages

City are also refusing to pay around £3m in agents fees and that’s why Samir Nasri’s £25m recruitment from Arsenal has stalled.

How can anyone print such utter fucking shite ? We're going to pay so Ade can play for spurs but we won't pay the £3m for Nasri ?

How fucking stupid do these people think their readers are ?
 
I'm sure it will be communicated in Spurs's favour in the media even if they pay his wages in all trough loan fee or whatever.

Last January we stopped making such idiot loans that we pay someone's wages while he is playing somewhere else. Bridge, RSC, Ade was out on loan but we didnt pay for them.
Bellamy and Robinho were the ones that could get these lucky loans.

But if we would do the same this summer Bellamy would already be at Cardiff again. And he isnt there for a reason.

Play the hardball Cook&Marwood! If they want our players on loan pay at least their wages. Thats still great for them because we could ask paying their wages + loan fee.
 
I remember when Ade signed he was on a disgraceful, disgusting £130k a week. Thats gone up to £175k a week according to most recent press, and if he costs us £30m over 3 years we're now looking at £200k a week.

Give it another week and he'll be on £250k a week, if we don't offload him this summer the press will be writing about his £300k a week contract next year.
 
Damanino said:
I'm sure it will be communicated in Spurs's favour in the media even if they pay his wages in all trough loan fee or whatever.

Last January we stopped making such idiot loans that we pay someone's wages while he is playing somewhere else. Bridge, RSC, Ade was out on loan but we didnt pay for them.
Bellamy and Robinho were the ones that could get these lucky loans.

But if we would do the same this summer Bellamy would already be at Cardiff again. And he isnt there for a reason.

Play the hardball Cook&Marwood! If they want our players on loan pay at least their wages. Thats still great for them because we could ask paying their wages + loan fee.
And if they say no? The truth is Spurs knows City wanna get rid off him desperately and no one can match his wages. There isnt team coming in for him except for Spurs. Even Real Madrid dont seem to be interested anymore. So Spurs knows they can wait to the last couple of days of the window and say we take him on loan and pay half of his wages......Thats still far better than he stays with you and play no football for months
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.