Afghanistan

Tell me what they were then ? The yanks signed the agreement on behalf of all the coalition forces. If we had stayed we would be in breach of an international agreement. We are too much of a lapdog to withdraw earlier.
The yanks ran the show, there was no discussion or debate.
If we believed complete withdrawal was wrong we could have used our influence with the US. Failing that, make a new agreement with like minded nations through the UN, Canada, Australia, France, Germany. Now we can watch as Afghanistan reverts to human rights abuses, torture, murder and being a vipers nest of terrorism. The US has a seventy year military presence in S Korea. A similar long term view should have been taken in Afghanistan.
 
If we believed complete withdrawal was wrong we could have used our influence with the US. Failing that, make a new agreement with like minded nations through the UN, Canada, Australia, France, Germany. Now we can watch as Afghanistan reverts to human rights abuses, torture, murder and being a vipers nest of terrorism. The US has a seventy year military presence in S Korea. A similar long term view should have been taken in Afghanistan.
I don't think the govt. did think withdrawal was wrong. Labour and the Liberals were also in favour of it.
The Americans ran the show from day 1. We were given an area to control, incidentally the worst area of Afghanistan, we never had a say in running/reforming the country.
If Canada, Australia and the rest were so keen to be involved they showed little interest for 20 years. No one wanted anything to do with the country other than the yanks and the puppets.
 
If we believed complete withdrawal was wrong we could have used our influence with the US. Failing that, make a new agreement with like minded nations through the UN, Canada, Australia, France, Germany. Now we can watch as Afghanistan reverts to human rights abuses, torture, murder and being a vipers nest of terrorism. The US has a seventy year military presence in S Korea. A similar long term view should have been taken in Afghanistan.
Just another point, what is so wrong with watching human rights abuses, torture, murder and everything else ?
We watch it and ignore it daily as it happens in Burma. We were fed daily news bulletins of Rohingya Muslims fleeing to Bangladesh but we did nothing.
It happens in African countries daily, the Middle East all over the world and no one says a thing so why is Afghanistan any different
 
If we believed complete withdrawal was wrong we could have used our influence with the US. Failing that, make a new agreement with like minded nations through the UN, Canada, Australia, France, Germany. Now we can watch as Afghanistan reverts to human rights abuses, torture, murder and being a vipers nest of terrorism. The US has a seventy year military presence in S Korea. A similar long term view should have been taken in Afghanistan.
The political will in the US to stay in Afghanistan collapsed many years ago. The reason for it is the war quickly transferred from a war against terrorism to what Biden has now called nation building. Americans aren't a fan of the latter, with the fear narrative Bush generated they wanted to eliminate Al Qaeda, remove the Taliban and well the Afghans would have to do the rest.

A lot of the failure here comes down to corruption and basically a total lack of leadership, leadership that we helped to put in place. You can't do much when the Afghan president apparently chose to negotiate with the Taliban and then jump into a plane to a safe haven with $200m in cash.

There is always going to more to this than people will ever know. It's not like the Taliban leadership have been sat in caves for the last 20 years, they've been sat in Qatar biding their time with full hospitality provided by the Qataris. The US met and negotiated with them in Qatar only last year... 10 years before that they were putting them in Guantanamo!
 
The US did come to an agreement with the Taliban, and then didn't make them stick to their side. It won't have taken long for the Taliban to realise that they weren't really bound by much, and with a stated deadline, they had no reason to hurry and risk provocation.

It's what happens when longterm hardnosed politics is taken over by populist gestures for short term 'wins', in this case the 2020 US election.

Whether the abandonment of Afghanistan presence can be linked to the abandonment of South China Sea presence remains to be confirmed.
 
I don't think the govt. did think withdrawal was wrong. Labour and the Liberals were also in favour of it.
The Americans ran the show from day 1. We were given an area to control, incidentally the worst area of Afghanistan, we never had a say in running/reforming the country.
If Canada, Australia and the rest were so keen to be involved they showed little interest for 20 years. No one wanted anything to do with the country other than the yanks and the puppets.
I’m torn. Emotionally, I feel sick as to what happens to Afghans that reject the Taliban. As I said, murder, torture.....
intellectually, I know what you are saying and probably agree with much of it, particularly that the U.K. ceased to have much influence in the world some time ago. Having taken the decision to withdraw, what has happened was inevitable.

I found this article quite helpful in understanding why the fully equipped 300,000 strong afghan army didn’t fight.
you look at that and just think wtf? Sounds like the military have been telling the politicians what they want to hear.

The victims in all this are those that helped the US/U.K. and every Afghan that has embraced western mores over the last few years. not to forget anyone that has been impacted by the injury or loss of a loved one in this awful conflict.
It will be a tragedy for many within the country. If terrorism takes hold who knows who else it will be a tragedy for.
 
The political will in the US to stay in Afghanistan collapsed many years ago. The reason for it is the war quickly transferred from a war against terrorism to what Biden has now called nation building. Americans aren't a fan of the latter, with the fear narrative Bush generated they wanted to eliminate Al Qaeda, remove the Taliban and well the Afghans would have to do the rest.

A lot of the failure here comes down to corruption and basically a total lack of leadership, leadership that we helped to put in place. You can't do much when the Afghan president apparently chose to negotiate with the Taliban and then jump into a plane to a safe haven with $200m in cash.

There is always going to more to this than people will ever know. It's not like the Taliban leadership have been sat in caves for the last 20 years, they've been sat in Qatar biding their time with full hospitality provided by the Qataris. The US met and negotiated with them in Qatar only last year... 10 years before that they were putting them in Guantanamo!
Good post mate. Nation building is what would have been needed, without that you cannot exterminate the Taliban or Al Queda. Nation building would have been hellish tricky in a country made up of so many factions. Still tragic though.
 
I’m torn. Emotionally, I feel sick as to what happens to Afghans that reject the Taliban. As I said, murder, torture.....
intellectually, I know what you are saying and probably agree with much of it, particularly that the U.K. ceased to have much influence in the world some time ago. Having taken the decision to withdraw, what has happened was inevitable.

I found this article quite helpful in understanding why the fully equipped 300,000 strong afghan army didn’t fight.
you look at that and just think wtf? Sounds like the military have been telling the politicians what they want to hear.

The victims in all this are those that helped the US/U.K. and every Afghan that has embraced western mores over the last few years. not to forget anyone that has been impacted by the injury or loss of a loved one in this awful conflict.
It will be a tragedy for many within the country. If terrorism takes hold who knows who else it will be a tragedy for.

I think that touches on the important points - there are a great many questions which can be answered 'yes' but asking them in isolation from consideration of consequences is rank idiocy and should be treated as such.

The very act of framing them in that manner indicates that the questioner doesn't want to have to consider the bigger picture - i.e. not considering the 'but'.

Politics should not be a balance sheet where everything has a £ or $ price.
 
Any responsible Government would sack Raab - the words responsible and Government are sadly misplaced in my previous comment.
 
Good post mate. Nation building is what would have been needed, without that you cannot exterminate the Taliban or Al Queda. Nation building would have been hellish tricky in a country made up of so many factions. Still tragic though.
It is indeed tragic but it's a cruel reality in those parts. The Taliban are actually nothing different to most of the regimes out there which is why I don't understand much of the outrage, the only real difference is they walk around with guns.

The media have been saying what will happen to gay, trans rights or inclusivity in Afghanistan now... As though they ever existed... There isn't really any country in the Middle East that doesn't have execution up there as a punishment for being gay...

We see the Taliban being painted as medieval but the reality is that stands for most of that region and the religion of Islam generally (when followed absolutely) unfortunately.
 
Yet another stupid political post. Millions to food banks !!!
I note he doesn't say how many refugees we should take. Iraq and Syria say hi, we fucked them over first. Then we can think about Burma, Zimbabwe, The Congo.
How about stop invading countries, stop trying to change how they live.
 
Tell me what they were then ? The yanks signed the agreement on behalf of all the coalition forces. If we had stayed we would be in breach of an international agreement. We are too much of a lapdog to withdraw earlier.
The yanks ran the show, there was no discussion or debate.

Trump signed the agreement in February 2020.

Everyone knew the date set in the agreement.

Why were we not evacuating the Afghans who risked their lives to help us for the last 18 months? Why are parliament debating refugee numbers this week and not 6, 8, 12 months ago?

I think most people can accept withdrawing after 20 years, but the manner in which we did it is disgraceful and we cannot hide behind Trump or the Americans for not handling our obligations until it was too late.
 
Last edited:
Any responsible Government would sack Raab - the words responsible and Government are sadly misplaced in my previous comment.

Look at the person who would be sacking him, even more incompetent than Raab. People still vote for these twats though which is the worrying thing.
 
Good post mate. Nation building is what would have been needed, without that you cannot exterminate the Taliban or Al Queda. Nation building would have been hellish tricky in a country made up of so many factions. Still tragic though.
Nation building, by that you mean 19th century Colonialism. Your little country will do what we say and how we do it. We don't care for your traditions, your way of life or your beliefs, we insist you do it the way we say. The first nations of America and Australia say hi.
I am not having a go at you but why do the yanks and us insist on telling people how to live.
 
Trump signed the agreement in February.

Everyone knew the date set in the agreement.

Why were we not evacuating the Afghans who risked their lives to help us for the last 6 months? Why are parliament debating refugee numbers this week and not 6 months ago?

I think most people can accept withdrawing after 20 years, but the manner in which we did it is disgraceful and we cannot hide behind Trump or the Americans for not handling our obligations until it was too late.
I think the powers that be thought the Afghan army trained by the West would put up a half decent fight, when actually they just melted away.

Who is supplying the Taliban with weapons and amunition? They are the ones who are to blame.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mat
I think the powers that be thought the Afghan army trained by the West would put up a half decent fight, when actually they just melted away.

Who is supplying the Taliban with weapons and amunition? They are the ones who are to blame.

Sorry but that's a piss poor excuse. The powers that be have known the Afghan army was not going to put up a decent fight because they knew there'd been huge numbers of deserters and defectors since the announcement of the withdrawal, and the release of the 5,000 Taliban prisoners.
 
Absolutely ridiculous isn't it.
Thousands are waiting for homes yet we can just let people in whilst gifting them freebies.
As usual this government treats tax payers with contempt whilst letting everyone in from overseas.
The UK is finished.
Hi Nigel.

Why are thousands waiting for homes? Because Thatcher sold all the fucking council stock off and barred local govt from replacing it in a mindless attempt to make the people think owning a home was like owning a castle, when in fact all it made them was slaves to the owners of capital. That is treating taxpayers with contempt.

As long as people like yourself continue with the free house, free car, free 50ft wide TV rhetoric the Govt can keep lining their mates pockets at the taxpayers expense.

Have you ever bothered looking at immigration figures, the UK takes in less than France, Germany, Greece, Italy and many other smaller states.
 
Trump signed the agreement in February 2020.

Everyone knew the date set in the agreement.

Why were we not evacuating the Afghans who risked their lives to help us for the last 18 months? Why are parliament debating refugee numbers this week and not 6, 8, 12 months ago?

I think most people can accept withdrawing after 20 years, but the manner in which we did it is disgraceful and we cannot hide behind Trump or the Americans for not handling our obligations until it was too late.
I agree but the people of this country seemed to be saying no more refugees, wether in boats or from anywhere, politicians merely reflect the people. Now the people have seen what a shit show it is they demand we bring them over. In 2 months time we will moan about no schools, boat people etc etc. The public change their minds depending on what Sky and others say.
I completely agree that we should have decided months ago who was coming and who was staying.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top