Aguero's penalty

[6one]

Re: Agueros penalty

It's not the media who decide what to mark it down as.

Everyone has acknowledged that history more than likely dictates he will be given the goal by the independent panel, but the 'rules' dictate it's an O.G.

You're ignorance, or just blue tinted view to this, is odd. But given your recent posts maybe it isn't.

The rules say it's Aguero's goal.

It's not blue-tinted. It's facts.

It is the media who decide what to mark it down as on their captions on the television and in the match reports in the papers and for the club's to decide. (interestingly chris bailey doesn't know the rules either)

That's the second time you've made that statement, and you're as wrong now as you were the first time.

http://www.premierleague.com/conten...014/epl.match-report.html/man-city-vs-everton

Here's the match page for the City v Everton game from the Officla Premeir League website. This isn't the independent media, it's the actual website from the league. Take a look at who scored City's third goal. Tim Howard (O.G). The people who run the competition that Aguero actually took the penalty in believe it was an own goal.

As I said earlier in the thread, I spoke to an actualy qualified referee about the issue and he made it very clear, once the ball ceased it's journey towards the goal (when it started to come back, away from the goal, off the post) the initial shot is deemed to have finished, after this the ball hit Howard, changed direction again, and went into the goal, therefore an own goal. It doesn't matter how many times you state "the rules say it's Aguero's goal" and "that's a fact", it doesn't make you right. The rules do not say it is Aguero's goal, and it most certainly is not a fact. If the rules were as clear as you seem to think they are then the Premier League would have credited Aguero with the goal, and referees, with the ability to consider the incident in depth after the fact, and consult the FA's rulebook, would credit it to Aguero too. They haven't.

That website is run by a media team, not a set of officials. jog on

 

[johnmc]

In a penalty shoot out it should be no goal. I doubt it ever would be.

 

[citytill1die84]

Re: Agueros penalty

The rules say it's Aguero's goal.

It's not blue-tinted. It's facts.

It is the media who decide what to mark it down as on their captions on the television and in the match reports in the papers and for the club's to decide. (interestingly chris bailey doesn't know the rules either)

That's the second time you've made that statement, and you're as wrong now as you were the first time.

http://www.premierleague.com/conten...014/epl.match-report.html/man-city-vs-everton

Here's the match page for the City v Everton game from the Officla Premeir League website. This isn't the independent media, it's the actual website from the league. Take a look at who scored City's third goal. Tim Howard (O.G). The people who run the competition that Aguero actually took the penalty in believe it was an own goal.

As I said earlier in the thread, I spoke to an actualy qualified referee about the issue and he made it very clear, once the ball ceased it's journey towards the goal (when it started to come back, away from the goal, off the post) the initial shot is deemed to have finished, after this the ball hit Howard, changed direction again, and went into the goal, therefore an own goal. It doesn't matter how many times you state "the rules say it's Aguero's goal" and "that's a fact", it doesn't make you right. The rules do not say it is Aguero's goal, and it most certainly is not a fact. If the rules were as clear as you seem to think they are then the Premier League would have credited Aguero with the goal, and referees, with the ability to consider the incident in depth after the fact, and consult the FA's rulebook, would credit it to Aguero too. They haven't.

That website is run by a media team, not a set of officials. jog on

It hit the post that means the shot was off target it then hit Howard to cross the line it's an O.G.

 

[Matty]

Re: Agueros penalty

The rules say it's Aguero's goal.

It's not blue-tinted. It's facts.

It is the media who decide what to mark it down as on their captions on the television and in the match reports in the papers and for the club's to decide. (interestingly chris bailey doesn't know the rules either)

That's the second time you've made that statement, and you're as wrong now as you were the first time.

http://www.premierleague.com/conten...014/epl.match-report.html/man-city-vs-everton

Here's the match page for the City v Everton game from the Officla Premeir League website. This isn't the independent media, it's the actual website from the league. Take a look at who scored City's third goal. Tim Howard (O.G). The people who run the competition that Aguero actually took the penalty in believe it was an own goal.

As I said earlier in the thread, I spoke to an actualy qualified referee about the issue and he made it very clear, once the ball ceased it's journey towards the goal (when it started to come back, away from the goal, off the post) the initial shot is deemed to have finished, after this the ball hit Howard, changed direction again, and went into the goal, therefore an own goal. It doesn't matter how many times you state "the rules say it's Aguero's goal" and "that's a fact", it doesn't make you right. The rules do not say it is Aguero's goal, and it most certainly is not a fact. If the rules were as clear as you seem to think they are then the Premier League would have credited Aguero with the goal, and referees, with the ability to consider the incident in depth after the fact, and consult the FA's rulebook, would credit it to Aguero too. They haven't.

That website is run by a media team, not a set of officials. jog on

Now you're just being a dick, and an annoying dick at that.

 

[6one]

Re: Agueros penalty

That's the second time you've made that statement, and you're as wrong now as you were the first time.

http://www.premierleague.com/conten...014/epl.match-report.html/man-city-vs-everton

Here's the match page for the City v Everton game from the Officla Premeir League website. This isn't the independent media, it's the actual website from the league. Take a look at who scored City's third goal. Tim Howard (O.G). The people who run the competition that Aguero actually took the penalty in believe it was an own goal.

As I said earlier in the thread, I spoke to an actualy qualified referee about the issue and he made it very clear, once the ball ceased it's journey towards the goal (when it started to come back, away from the goal, off the post) the initial shot is deemed to have finished, after this the ball hit Howard, changed direction again, and went into the goal, therefore an own goal. It doesn't matter how many times you state "the rules say it's Aguero's goal" and "that's a fact", it doesn't make you right. The rules do not say it is Aguero's goal, and it most certainly is not a fact. If the rules were as clear as you seem to think they are then the Premier League would have credited Aguero with the goal, and referees, with the ability to consider the incident in depth after the fact, and consult the FA's rulebook, would credit it to Aguero too. They haven't.

That website is run by a media team, not a set of officials. jog on

It hit the post that means the shot was off target it then hit Howard to cross the line it's an O.G.

No. The shot was on target as it was saved by Howard onto the post.

How thick do you have to be not to understand that?

 

[Big Dave Watson]

Has this been verified one way or the other yet?

 

[Phil1]

Re: Agueros penalty

That website is run by a media team, not a set of officials. jog on

It hit the post that means the shot was off target it then hit Howard to cross the line it's an O.G.

No. The shot was on target as it was saved by Howard onto the post.

How thick do you have to be not to understand that?

You seem to be very angry about this - did you have a few quid on Aguero last goal?

 

[Matty]

Re: Agueros penalty

That website is run by a media team, not a set of officials. jog on

It hit the post that means the shot was off target it then hit Howard to cross the line it's an O.G.

No. The shot was on target as it was saved by Howard onto the post.

How thick do you have to be not to understand that?

I'd be careful when assessing other people's levels of thickness, given your inaccurate statements of "fact" throughout this thread.

 

[Jason]

Re: Agueros penalty

That website is run by a media team, not a set of officials. jog on

It hit the post that means the shot was off target it then hit Howard to cross the line it's an O.G.

No. The shot was on target as it was saved by Howard onto the post.

How thick do you have to be not to understand that?

You best contact the MCFC official site then as they also seem to think its an own goal

 

[6one]

Re: Agueros penalty

It hit the post that means the shot was off target it then hit Howard to cross the line it's an O.G.

No. The shot was on target as it was saved by Howard onto the post.

How thick do you have to be not to understand that?

You best contact the MCFC official site then as they also seem to think its an own goal

All the media outlets have said that.

Regardless of whether you think it's a goal.

It's simply not possible to think Aguero's shot was off-target.

It's highly accurate to say that someone is thick, very thick, to think that the shot was off-target, when it's clear that it wasn't.