We're repeating ourselves now but anyway
1) I don't rate Wenger. Used to. But not getting into that minefield
2) You wont get Mbappe, but I think Mahrez is available if you're willing to pay £40 plus million. I would. Outstanding talent
3) Arsenal hold his contract but I don't think it would be a good idea to hold him to his last 12 months if his heart is not in it - his head is already elsewhere and you must know that.
4) I don't think City fans are as biased as Arsenal fans on this. Sanchez is Arsenal's star. City's forward line is good enough without sanchez, and if we don't get him next season, we'll have £200m next season to buy the best. Providing there is no implosion this coming season, which looks unlikely, City will get stronger and stronger. Arsenal on the other other hand have a team that is coming to the end of the line very rapidly - Cech, mertseacker, Ozil, Cazorla, Sanchez
that is one shit deal.
30m for Ross is a joke.Not really. One former player of the year and the other a headless chicken on his last year of his contract.
30m for Ross is a joke.
To be fair I think Mahrez, like Vardy, Drinkwater, Morgan, Huth, Fuchs, Simpson and Albrighton, played brilliantly in that title-winning season but is actually not that good, and seems to have gotten too big for his boots with the transfer request.Not really. One former player of the year and the other a headless chicken on his last year of his contract.
30m for Ross is a joke.
It's funny how ours is bias and yours is analysis.
Am I being thick here. Could you explain how that maths works please, because I don't understand what you mean. If you keep him don't you lose £50m and also have to pay his wages as well?
Haha this arsenal fan thinks they're gonna sign Mbappe. They never learn, all these exciting rumours are for you to renew your season ticket which you will do and then you end up with redmond.