Not the scum then!You can bet, given our profile as a club and activity in the transfer market, that we will have been tested as part of this 'investigation'. Would imagine that some of the other big boys will have been as well.
Not the scum then!You can bet, given our profile as a club and activity in the transfer market, that we will have been tested as part of this 'investigation'. Would imagine that some of the other big boys will have been as well.
Indeed.The funniest thing about all this is hearing fat Sam's sycophantic pals in the media, the sports hacks who turned a blind eye, insisting that he can survive this. Having read the first instalment it is certain that the FA will have to sack him. His credibility and authority is shredded and he can't be a leader for English football, How predictable that on Talksport Brazil criticises the "people who set Sam up." We will hear the same platitudes we heard when the Telegraph exposed MPs for being "pigs in the trough." City fans, more than most, know that the Governance of football is rotten to the core here and abroad. It's time the game was cleaned up properly.
You could be right but there seems to be no comeback if it's not the major story it's made out to be.The Telegraph, specifically Paul Kelso I believe, were given some earth-shattering stuff some time ago with clear evidence of large-scale corruption in the game including phone call recordings/transcripts and suspicious betting patterns but they never ran it. Yet they managed to run a headline splash with a nasty little sting. If it's a taster for some of the big stuff they already have that they're going to throw in then fine. But if it's just minor league stuff then it'll garner a few headlines but be next week's chip-paper.
I'm hoping the delay on this is for legal opinion. Sadly I suspect not. As you say it might be allegations made against ex coaches/managers which will mean nothing.The Telegraph, specifically Paul Kelso I believe, were given some earth-shattering stuff some time ago with clear evidence of large-scale corruption in the game including phone call recordings/transcripts and suspicious betting patterns but they never ran it. Yet they managed to run a headline splash with a nasty little sting. If it's a taster for some of the big stuff they already have that they're going to throw in then fine. But if it's just minor league stuff then it'll garner a few headlines but be next week's chip-paper.
1) No, he said it was possible (which we all know)He talked about how to get around FA rules
He slagged off his employers the FA
He took the piss out of the last manager Roy
He negotiated a £400k deal
Any one of them would get an average person sacked from their job I don't see why Fat Sam should be any different?
Just pointing out that the tory party are in crisis over Brexit, people are wising up to media bias on Labour. So the Torygraph runs with sensationalist headlines for a week to hope it dies down before their conference.You could be right but there seems to be no comeback if it's not the major story it's made out to be.
The Sunday Times had 'evidence' of widespread performance enhancing drug taking by Arsenal, Chelsea and Leicester. They presented absolutely no evidence, save for some deluded 'doctor' who quickly recanted the whole thing (false and misleading were his words) and yet the journalist and his bosses walk away unscathed.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/foot...hotel-room-in-genoa-in-a-mysterious-burgalry/I remember being told some years ago about a certain reasonably well-known manager being given a briefcase full of notes in connection with a transfer. I was told this was seen as a 'perk' of the job.
The guy who told me was quite well-connected in business circles, but I was never quite sure whether the story was bollocks or not. The suspicious part of me thinks that this might have been quite common practice at one time.