Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 57,408
Which would be totally disproportionate as he was successfully subdued without the need for lethal force.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Altercation at Terminal 2
- Thread starter blue44
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
I’ll tell you what. A soldier is nearly killed in a comply unprovoked attack and I’ve hardly heard anything about it.
An armed policeman (there for a reason) kicks some **** in the head and its wall to wall.
Possibly because there is no video footage of it.
Video clips rule social media.
LangleyBlue1970
Well-Known Member
You have no idea what was going on. He moved his head toward the officer, so on that basis he got neutralised. No threat anymore.Which would be totally disproportionate as he was successfully subdued without the need for lethal force.
gingerprince
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Oct 2007
- Messages
- 1,134
Never mind the kick and the stamp he could have blinded that other bloke
shining that torch into his eyes
shining that torch into his eyes
LangleyBlue1970
Well-Known Member
I get that and acknowledged it earlier in the thread.Possibly because there is no video footage of it.
Video clips rule social media.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 57,408
Given the incident concluded without the need for lethal force, it’s pretty safe to assume that lethal force wasn’t required.You have no idea what was going on. He moved his head toward the officer, so on that basis he got neutralised. No threat anymore.
I think if you read my earlier post on what laws apply to the use of police force-shooting him may have been a tad unreasonableIMO he shouldn't be assaulting armed police, they should have just shot him.
IMO he shouldn't be assaulting armed police, they should have just shot him.
No i don't think they should have just shot him. They only shoot if someone is carrying a weapon and there is a threat to life of people and their own.
Again, you have no idea what actually happened that led to the incident but you're taking the police at their word.
Lets wait until the full story comes out, either at the persons trial (if he has one) and/or the police investigation into the incident.
Think victim ,one is newsworthy the other is just a white soldier
Yeah, just say you don't like Muslims and stop the dog whistling.
MadchesterCity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 17,682
Well done to the officers, we should all be thankful they are there to protect us from terrorists and scum at the airports
- Status
- Not open for further replies.