Altercation at Terminal 2

[Aphex]

There's a fine line between carte blanche, the police and use of reasonable force. In an airport of all things, it needs to neutralised in split seconds. I think overall the police got it right.

 

[Bigga]

there were 3 at the time, one had already used a tazor round and the other couldn't see properly with a broken nose. The policeman was the only one there with control

Pretty sure the original video shows another male in shot.

Yes, there are two more males on scene late on.

The original officer in the skirmish had not deployed the taser, it was the secondary female officer also caught by the assailant that did so.

So three in the beginning, reduced to two with the injury, one of whom deployed the weapon. The kicking officer did not deploy a shot when he had his taser aimed at the offender.

That's my argument for that choice. Not sure why others are twisting what I said out of proportion, but it is what it is for this place.

 

[Jack74]

The size of his nose, Lee Bradbury couldn’t miss

You had to take one step to far

 

[Blackley_Blue]

I missed that. Was it an interview with him, and is it online anywhere?

No and No

 

[mosssideblue]

No and No

So you must have spoken with him, yes?

 

[Bigga]

No. You seem to think they had time to muse over their options and do an analysis on the situation.

There were members of the public in the immediate vicinity and at potential risk and an instantaneous decision was required.

I suppose his firearm was an option... maybe that's what you'd suggest?

The original video shows the kicking officer had his taser aimed at the perp.

So, he made a choice.



It was his colleague to his immediate right that deployed the shot immobilising the offender. the offender had grabbed the male officer from behind allowing the other officer to shoot. The offender is turning his head mid action in the pic a couple of secs after being tased.

The moment the officer gets up and points his weapon and then actioning. The only reason my point discounts is if the male officer has deployed his weapon, but he's pointing it.

Not sure what's so difficult to understand here?

 

[Aphex]

The original video shows the kicking officer had his taser aimed at the perp.

So, he made a choice.

View attachment 126954

It was his colleague to his immediate right that deployed the shot immobilising the offender. the offender had grabbed the male officer from behind allowing the other officer to shoot. The offender is turning his head mid action in the pic a couple of secs after being tased.

The moment the officer gets up and points his weapon and then actioning. The only reason my point discounts is if the male officer has deployed his weapon, but he's pointing it.

Not sure what's so difficult to understand here?

Is that his radio mid air?

 

[Drewmanc]

Pretty sure the original video shows another male in shot.

Yes, there are two more males on scene late on.

The original officer in the skirmish had not deployed the taser, it was the secondary female officer also caught by the assailant that did so.

So three in the beginning, reduced to two with the injury, one of whom deployed the weapon. The kicking officer did not deploy a shot when he had his taser aimed at the offender.

That's my argument for that choice. Not sure why others are twisting what I said out of proportion, but it is what it is for this place.

A failed charge in his taser? He missed his shot? I'm sure it will out in the enquiry.

 

[bluemc1]

The original video shows the kicking officer had his taser aimed at the perp.

So, he made a choice.

View attachment 126954

It was his colleague to his immediate right that deployed the shot immobilising the offender. the offender had grabbed the male officer from behind allowing the other officer to shoot. The offender is turning his head mid action in the pic a couple of secs after being tased.

The moment the officer gets up and points his weapon and then actioning. The only reason my point discounts is if the male officer has deployed his weapon, but he's pointing it.

Not sure what's so difficult to understand here?

But would you accept there’s a chance he’s already used his taser earlier ( which he had on the big lads hand ) tried again which is what it looks like he’s trying to do in the first second, it doesn’t work so he kicks him instead ?

I will make the point though that you were saying last night the elder brother stepped in on instinct to help his brother
Well look at that picture, look at the brother now he’s felt the taser, he’s able to control his instincts now while his brother gets booted in the face
People are less likely to fuck about once they know there’s consequences

 

[eyalluvitt]

There's a fine line between carte blanche, the police and use of reasonable force. In an airport of all things, it needs to neutralised in split seconds. I think overall the police got it right.

In 90% of Airports in the world he is neutralized instantly for battering three anti terror cops, he is a very lucky boy it was in softly softly tolerant United Kingdom