ChicagoBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 21,981
Oh fuck, the dreaded hashtag!Yet here we are 5 posts later. #nottheend.
“The end” does not relate to the entire topic, but merely the specific point under discussion.! smh
Oh fuck, the dreaded hashtag!Yet here we are 5 posts later. #nottheend.
So THREE times in total ? Is that fact ?They were moving on each time the last one before the conversion attempt. The first one was in T2 baggage hall, then T2 Starbucks, (allegedly first punch up with the police), then finally the conversion attempt.
I don't think that anybody is being apologist. They just want the Police to be effective and the Police are going to be the opposite of effective if a precedent is set which means they're too scared to act and do their job. The cost of subsequent inaction in another scenario could be far greater.
The Police are also human and they shouldn't be elevated above human standards. I know @ChicagoBlue that you're involved in aviation so have you ever made a mistake and had to learn from it? Of course you will have, it's ridiculous to expect 100% standards.
100% standards cannot be mandatory and I challenge anybody to get smacked in the face and not think of defending themselves first, often through whatever means available. Our physical instincts do not allow it, we're animals and we're designed to fight and ask questions later.
Typically the officer using the taser would shout ‘taser! taser!’ to alert their colleagues.Do you know that tasers are wired electric shock?
So unless the design of them have changed the officer could see the lad was immobile after being tased.
I wonder if @bert38 can tell the board that if a taser is dispatched the officer shooting would have to declare the warning or, indeed, if the design of the weapon has changed.
I cannot make an assumption about the taser usage.
The comment was “He knew his responsibilities preclude such behavior. The end.”The end? That’ll be for the independent review to decide. Thankfully.
The comment was “He knew his responsibilities preclude such behavior. The end.”
Do you think he didn’t know that?
Do you think it’s in the handbook?
Do you think Officer Kickandstomp did it by the book?
I’m saying HE knew what he did was a result of the red mist descending. He lost his sense of being a police officer and reverted to street thuggery.
But, yes, an “independent review” will decide his punishment or lack thereof, not his knowing his actions were excessive. I think we all know that, or should…although all seems copacetic for some, so there’s that.
Stop being a wet fart, the policing was adequate and would never had happened if people were civilised.Hit a cop, then the just desserts are a full swing boot to the head while you’re down, plus a little head stomping for good measure, is “OK, in my book!” Good GMP policing, that!
Got it!
This place is a fucking laugh factory sometimes!
Stop being a wet fart, the policing was adequate and would never had happened if people were civilised.
Absolutely, those guys assaulting cops must have been on the lash all day. I knew it was an easy answer. Congrats.Here’s an idea. How about they ban alcohol sales at airports and on planes because it’s a ticking fucking timebomb with fuckers that can’t behave when they’re pissed. Also get the cunts breathalysed before boarding and if you’re pissed you ain’t getting on a plane.
I doubt these guys were drunk mate, however I do agree with banning alcohol, my wife used to work for Monarch before it went bust, drunk passengers are a nightmare and she didn’t do many 18-30 type crowds either, the few times the did late Ibiza flights they wouldn’t serve alcohol on the plane, passengers would drink their own stuff and it was nightmare trying to stop them.Here’s an idea. How about they ban alcohol sales at airports and on planes because it’s a ticking fucking timebomb with fuckers that can’t behave when they’re pissed. Also get the cunts breathalysed before boarding and if you’re pissed you ain’t getting on a plane.
It is when you put your two penneth in for sure.Hit a cop, then the just desserts are a full swing boot to the head while you’re down, plus a little head stomping for good measure, is “OK, in my book!” Good GMP policing, that!
Got it!
This place is a fucking laugh factory sometimes!
No need for the sarcasm. They may not have been on the piss or they may have been on the piss. Banning alcohol at airports and on planes may just make both the airport and a plane journey a safer and more enjoyable experience for the majority of people. Regardless of whether these cunts were pissed or not.Absolutely, those guys assaulting cops must have been on the lash all day. I knew it was an easy answer. Congrats.
Yeah I can imagine how much of a nightmare it must’ve been for your wife.I doubt these guys were drunk mate, however I do agree with banning alcohol, my wife used to work for Monarch before it went bust, drunk passengers are a nightmare and she didn’t do many 18-30 type crowds either, the few times the did late Ibiza flights they wouldn’t serve alcohol on the plane, passengers would drink their own stuff and it was nightmare trying to stop them.
The comment was “He knew his responsibilities preclude such behavior. The end.”
Do you think he didn’t know that?
Do you think it’s in the handbook?
Do you think Officer Kickandstomp did it by the book?
I’m saying HE knew what he did was a result of the red mist descending. He lost his sense of being a police officer and reverted to street thuggery.
But, yes, an “independent review” will decide his punishment or lack thereof, not his knowing his actions were excessive. I think we all know that, or should…although all seems copacetic for some, so there’s that.
Yes I think he was defending himself and had to resort to whatever means to control the two thugs, one included using a bit of excess force to put a stop to the fighting. The test of that is easy, by this point the officer had a head injury and another officer had their nose broken and they were fighting two animals.Do you HONESTLY think the cop in question ( Officer Kickandstomp) was “defending” himself? If so, I think we have stretched credulity beyond its natural limits.
He should get a ticking off but sacked ? I hope not.I believe it is. They knew their responsibilities and they certainly didn’t extend to a drop kick and stomp on the head…regardless of circumstance.
If you believe those actions were necessary, based on his training and responsibilities, then I don’t know what to say.
He knew his responsibilities preclude such behavior. The end.