Ancelotti Sacked!!! Official...................

[kevodevo]

Re: Chelsea sack manager

Says a lot about Chelski- they''ll be lucky to stay in top four nest season

 

[BoyBlue_1985]

Re: Chelsea sack manager

Not surprised he looked useless after Wilkins left

 

[awest]

Re: Chelsea sack manager

Media attack on classless Chelsea?

 

[badmash]

Re: Chelsea sack manager

Media attack on classless Chelsea?

This

 

[S04]

Nota Bene..Mancini is the only manager Abu Dhabi have hired, Hughes was inherited.

 

[Castiel]

We'll have to agree to disagree on them points then.

There's going to be a big shake up at your place this summer and big money is going to be spent.

Its long overdue tbh.

 

[tommo]

Re: Chelsea sack manager

Let's hope so but doubt the london mafia will do so

 

[bluemoon27]

Re: Chelsea sack manager

ridiculous

 

[blueinsa]

There's so many wrongs in this post i don't know where to start?

1, Wilkins departure was nothing to do with his contract

2, Chelsea's decline coincided with Wilkins departure, that's as clear as day

3, Abramovich's fault for sacking Wilkins and buying an out of form striker in Jan whilst insisting he plays against Ancelotti wishes.

4, As Above

5, If you stuck with Drogba and Anelka up front for the remainder season you would of done better.

Abramovich should of waited until the summer, farmed Drogba out and then got Torres, instead he panic buyed and it back fired.

Your loss is someone elses gain because Ancelotti is a good manager and has been working with his hands tied.

* I still think you'll be the biggest spenders in the summer

1. Yes, it was - among other things.
2. Wilkins departure, Ancelotti's father dying, Lampard, Essien, Drogba and Terry out also contributes.
3. I've already said, Torres was Ancelotti's main target since his first season here.
4 + 5. Its the managers job to select his squad, and he picked players out of form. He should have stuck with Drogba I agree, but Roman has nothing to do with team selection. How you can say otherwise is astonishing to me because he has never given an interview in his life and no previous coaches have claimed that he interfered with on pitch matters at all.

Again, I'm not defending the decision. I think it was wrong to let him go because so many factors were beyond his control this season. I was just pointing out why he was let go.

We'll have to agree to disagree on them points then.

There's going to be a big shake up at your place this summer and big money is going to be spent.

Well if Rom isn't arsed about FFPR, why the fuck should we? ;-)

 

[blue dallas]

Just to bring you up to speed on why this happened.

1. Ray Wilkins wanted more than the board thought he deserved from his contract. In short he got greedy and left.

2. Ancelotti's father died in Italy this year which no doubt upset him. That happened around the time Chelsea's form started to decline. I suspect he felt guilty that he was in England when this happened.

3. This was Chelsea's least successful season since Abramovich's take over.

4. The same out of form players were selected over better performing youth and bench warmers.

5. He never stuck with a playing style or formation which lead to very erratic performances.

I really like Ancelotti. You'll never meet a nicer man and he's a decent manager to boot. But at the height of professional football you can't have a season that bad and keep your job. Its just a fact of the business (unless you're Ferguson or Wenger).

and he signed a player who hasnt performed for 2 years for £50 mill
who in return scored 1 goal in 5 months !