oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Anyone been on to Rag Cafe or Rawk ?
Surely they must be spitting feathers. ;)
Surely they must be spitting feathers. ;)
Karen just kicked her cat.Our books are gonna look absolutely crazy if it includes next period £100m plus for Sane and £65m for Puma!
We will be closer to £700m than £600m?
Anyone been on to Rag Cafe or Rawk ?
Surely they must be spitting feathers. ;)
Thanks for explaining that to me.we do, its those who choose not to go sit in said seats that are the problem
Sarcy fucker. ;)Thanks for explaining that to me.
I don't bother with RAWK. Nothing on Red Cafe as of a few minutes ago but I think they're all piling in on the Glazers and Woodward in another thread. And there's the rub - no doubt some of them will scoff at the "reality" of our figures when they get round to it but they should set all that bitter shite aside for a moment and weigh up the statements from the likes of Khaldoon/Soriano compared to Woodward yesterday. The former talks about the beautiful football, forward planning, and the success on the pitch as being a key factor in driving up revenues whereas the other doesn't seem to give a fuck about on-field performances
Given the positions we need to buy for in the next few windows that Sane money will likely be spent a few times over.Our books are gonna look absolutely crazy if it includes next period £100m plus for Sane and £65m for Puma!
We will be closer to £700m than £600m?
That's a figure for CFG, the £45 is our share, I believe.yep i thought it was £650 million over ten years so more like £65 million a year
Absolutely brilliant. Do the morons tweeting that stuff actually believe what they are saying or are they just ignorant and/or bitter.It's already started:-
Manchester City say they have posted “record revenues of £535.2 million, the eleventh consecutive year of growth under the ownership of His Highness Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed.”
5:11 am - 19 Nov 2019
5 replies .4 retweets7 likes
New conversation
Razman @razman14 29m29 minutes ago
Replying to @tariqpanja
Was that hard to type ?
1 reply .0 retweets0 likes
tariq panjaVerified account @tariqpanja 24m24 minutes ago
No. Most of it was copy + paste
0 replies .0 retweets4 likes
End of conversation
EPL Football Talk @PLfootballtalk 28m28 minutes ago
Replying to @tariqpanja
All above the board for sure
0 replies .0 retweets1 like
New conversation
Eggy @TheBoiledEgg 22m22 minutes ago
Replying to @tariqpanja
530 of that was payment to themselves
1 reply .0 retweets1 like
- 1 more reply
philweb @philweb11 3m3 minutes ago
Replying to @tariqpanja
Nobody other than City fans and of course PL believe it, most of it via inflated sponsorship deals via the Sheik
0 replies .0 retweets0 likes
johncolf @Johncolf 20m20 minutes ago
Replying to @tariqpanja
Who’s doing their tax returns Gary Barlow , don’t believe such a smallish club with a shite fan base can rack up that much revenue
0 replies .0 retweets0 likes
I don’t think it’s that. I think he’s making the point that we are so far past that period in our evolution and 5 years of profits mean we don’t even need to discuss it any more.
What did you expect it to be?Surprised the profit is only 10m.
What did you expect it to be?