Lol!ElanJo said:Quicksilva21 said:brooklandsblue2.0 said:I don't have family like that. If someones in my house uninvited in the dead of the night Im blowing their head off, no questions asked, in the USA I'd be a hero, here I'd be a criminal.
What about if some drunk munter stumbles in there after his mate gives him the wrong address? Still fair game?? It happens...
Steal his kebab
I cant understand why these right wing loonies dont understand that no guns means no shootings, it`s not rocket sciencemcmanus said:It hardly shocks me anymore.
twitter said:I cant understand why these right wing loonies dont understand that no guns means no shootings, it`s not rocket sciencemcmanus said:It hardly shocks me anymore.
by magicElanJo said:twitter said:I cant understand why these right wing loonies dont understand that no guns means no shootings, it`s not rocket sciencemcmanus said:It hardly shocks me anymore.
How do you propose getting rid of the existence of guns?
Quicksilva21 said:Lol!ElanJo said:Quicksilva21 said:What about if some drunk munter stumbles in there after his mate gives him the wrong address? Still fair game?? It happens...
Steal his kebab
...once you've blown the poor bastards brains out cos u 'don't ask questions?'
Just feeling you libertarians out.ElanJo said:prairiemoon said:It is a bit difficult to argue moral powers to property rights under a limited government whose only role is to protect citizens from coercion and violence when certain external things are the very tools of said coercion and violence, for instance.... If that is the version of "Libertarianism" with which you choose to affiliateElanJo said:How?
One of the reasons why I'm an anarchist rather than a minarchist (if what you're saying is that the existence of a state breaks the fundamentals of libertarianism - your post is a bit on the vague side)
squirtyflower said:by magicElanJo said:twitter said:I cant understand why these right wing loonies dont understand that no guns means no shootings, it`s not rocket science
How do you propose getting rid of the existence of guns?
not according to the 'religion in modern society' thread!ElanJo said:squirtyflower said:by magicElanJo said:How do you propose getting rid of the existence of guns?
I fear you may have overlooked the fact that the population of Wizards has dwindled in modern times.
prairiemoon said:Just feeling you libertarians out.ElanJo said:prairiemoon said:It is a bit difficult to argue moral powers to property rights under a limited government whose only role is to protect citizens from coercion and violence when certain external things are the very tools of said coercion and violence, for instance.... If that is the version of "Libertarianism" with which you choose to affiliate
One of the reasons why I'm an anarchist rather than a minarchist (if what you're saying is that the existence of a state breaks the fundamentals of libertarianism - your post is a bit on the vague side)
I take it you're a "common ownership"-type as well, or would you prefer a system of reciprocity?
squirtyflower said:not according to the 'religion in modern society' thread!ElanJo said:squirtyflower said:by magic
I fear you may have overlooked the fact that the population of Wizards has dwindled in modern times.