Another new Brexit thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Won’t happen. E27 states will wait to see how the U.K. treats their citizens. What we do to them will define how each state treats ours. Once you strip out protections as EU citizens then they become hostages to fortune and all that.

We'll treat them the same way the majority view all 'Johnny Foreigners' .... with disdain and contempt ...

However Verhofstadt has a solution




No doubt Tommeeee Robinson and Hatie Kopkins (Tory Party members ) will have some thing to say about it ....
 
And that's all fine. There's still an issue with the framing of it though in that the EUs very good deal they had with May still allowed them a fall back to a still acceptable position for them, which is why they were fine with Varadkar sorting it out directly with Johnson. Johnsons public position (and Mays before him) was that there absolutely wouldn't be a border on the Irish Sea. He fell back from that position in order to get his agreement.

That can still be argued as per your second paragraph, in that "parties make public statements about all sorts of positions which are very far from the truth, but that they may climb down from those positions if forced to do so". It never seems to be mentioned that that is exactly what Johnson did, only that the EU were perceived to because of a threat of no deal.

The other thing to mention is it's still an acceptable position to the EU as ultimately they were happy as long as Varadkar was - they still haven't broken any of their red lines at all, only given up what they weren't expecting in the first place. I'm sure plenty of people are also happy with Johnsons deal too, there are still some that think him being the head of the "Conservative and Unionist Party" should still mean something though...
I am afraid that is a very simplistic way of looking at it

For the EU - the unfettered backstop in May's deal gave them comprehensive and exclusive control over future negotiations and full capability to neuter any threat that the UK could pose as a competitor

You make it sound like a - nice to have

Very wrong - the EU did not want to reopen the WA

This simple fact is missed by a lot on here
 
I am afraid that is a very simplistic way of looking at it

For the EU - the unfettered backstop in May's deal gave them comprehensive and exclusive control over future negotiations and full capability to neuter any threat that the UK could pose as a competitor

You make it sound like a - nice to have

Very wrong - the EU did not want to reopen the WA

This simple fact is missed by a lot on here

But the Eu did open the WA and presented the clown with an offer that they had already made to May ... which was unacceptable if you didnt want to instigate the break up of the Union ... but it was acceptable to the clown because money comes into it ... Corrupt.
 
I am afraid that is a very simplistic way of looking at it

For the EU - the unfettered backstop in May's deal gave them comprehensive and exclusive control over future negotiations and full capability to neuter any threat that the UK could pose as a competitor

You make it sound like a - nice to have

Very wrong - the EU did not want to reopen the WA

This simple fact is missed by a lot on here

The EU were not calling the shots. Varadkar was calling the shots. Varadkar got what he wanted. No land border in Ireland and as a consequence NI falling under the economic writ of the EU.

The EU mandate for negotiations was set by the leaders of the E27 nations. It was the leaders who decided whether the WA was to be opened, not the EU. Barnier reports to the leaders. Not the other way round.

Three years and you still haven’t worked this out.
 
I am afraid that is a very simplistic way of looking at it

For the EU - the unfettered backstop in May's deal gave them comprehensive and exclusive control over future negotiations and full capability to neuter any threat that the UK could pose as a competitor

You make it sound like a - nice to have

Very wrong - the EU did not want to reopen the WA

This simple fact is missed by a lot on here

You’ve missed the point of my post though. The entire framing it has been exactly as you’ve described there. As I said, that’s fine. If you’re going to do it though, then it also has to be acknowledged that Johnson also moved position. Only one of them broke their original stated red lines. The NI only backstop was completely written up at the time and agreed upon.

You can’t say my post is simplistic by arguing an even more simplistic point that I acknowledged anyway ;)
 
The EU were not calling the shots. Varadkar was calling the shots. Varadkar got what he wanted. No land border in Ireland and as a consequence NI falling under the economic writ of the EU.

The EU mandate for negotiations was set by the leaders of the E27 nations. It was the leaders who decided whether the WA was to be opened, not the EU. Barnier reports to the leaders. Not the other way round.

Three years and you still haven’t worked this out.
It’s the first big step to a united Ireland imo. Obviously they’ll have to tread carefully and give the unionist community some limited autonomy, but I can see it happening in the next few years. Even the the most radical unionists must have realised by now that they can’t rely on an English Tory government to stand up for their interests.
 
It’s the first big step to a united Ireland imo. Obviously they’ll have to tread carefully and give the unionist community some limited autonomy, but I can see it happening in the next few years. Even the the most radical unionists must have realised by now that they can’t rely on an English Tory government to stand up for their interests.

A lot will depend on how much England wants to ‘diverge’ from the EU. The greater the divergence the harder the custom border between NI and GB becomes and the more NI resembles the rest of Ireland. It will be the same with Scotland but not as obvious. The more England tries to pull away from the EU the greater the resistance in NI and Scotland builds up.

Scotland wants to go down a different path and NI is being partly forced down a different path and in the end independence or reunification will become as much a rubber stamping of the reality on the ground rather than dramatic overnight change.

The minute we left NI within the EU economic sphere and accepted an internal customs border our Union ended. And it ended because we valued Brexit over the Union.
 
But the Eu did open the WA and presented the clown with an offer that they had already made to May ... which was unacceptable if you didnt want to instigate the break up of the Union ... but it was acceptable to the clown because money comes into it ... Corrupt.
You just do not appear to be capable of understanding basic truths
 
The EU were not calling the shots. Varadkar was calling the shots. Varadkar got what he wanted. No land border in Ireland and as a consequence NI falling under the economic writ of the EU.

The EU mandate for negotiations was set by the leaders of the E27 nations. It was the leaders who decided whether the WA was to be opened, not the EU. Barnier reports to the leaders. Not the other way round.

Three years and you still haven’t worked this out.
You do appear capable of understanding basics - but are just a bit selective in a slippery kind of way in how you spin them
 
But the Eu did open the WA and presented the clown with an offer that they had already made to May ... which was unacceptable if you didnt want to instigate the break up of the Union ... but it was acceptable to the clown because money comes into it ... Corrupt.
Are we going to have to put up with 5 years of this? What are you hoping to achieve with your incessant bile?
 
There's a lot of it about.
Best just let it go.
Let the healing begin.

I really dont see much possibility of healing. There are too many divisions and whilst the current opposition remaiin unelectable, despite Tory promises which almost always end up being lies the divisions will grow.

Regarding Brexit i think it will be a decade before we might even have an idea, only then if it has gone well will any healing on this issue at least begin.
 
Last edited:
I really dont see much possibility of healing. There are too many divisions and whilst the current opposition remaiin unelectable, despite Tory promises which almost always end up being lies the divisions will grow.
If you don't like those slogans, I've got others.
One that's sprung to mind several times over the months is this from Jack Nicholson;
"You want the truth, you can't handle the truth".
 
If you don't like those slogans, I've got others.
One that's sprung to mind several times over the months is this from Jack Nicholson;
"You want the truth, you can't handle the truth".

The problem with that one in this case is i am not sure anyone knows the truth. Many want the truth but havent a clue whethet we can handle it or otherwise.

Until that alters i dont see any prospect of this great healing and unification happening.
 
The problem with that one in this case is i am not sure anyone knows the truth. Many want the truth but havent a clue whethet we can handle it or otherwise.

Until that alters i dont see any prospect of this great healing and unification happening.
"Reach out to the other side" ?
 
"Reach out to the other side" ?

Will that happen? Offering what?, this is about beliiefs that are entrenched and about as far apart as you can get.

I think only time can bring people together and only if Brexit goes well and everyone benefits. The other factor could be the failure of the EU, which I can see happening, and was my own reason for voting to leave.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top