Another new Brexit thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yet Corbyn did the opposite - he even put himself before the Labour Party's interests
He thought the party's interests were in appeasing both sides in order to get a better/softer deal and thus give the country a choice. I'm not sure why that would not have been in the country's interests.

Resigning as leader would certainly have been in the party's interest.
 
Some things go beyond what's the best economic policy. For example, it's not usually economically a great idea to go to war, but unfortunately sometimes you just have to. If we have voted to leave the EU, then leave we must and if it's economically damaging then we will have to accept that and deal with it.
You spent 3 years arguing how damaging it would be and wanting another referendum.

From my perspective, (May) she's behaved like a Leaver pretty much throughout. She's steadfastly and devoutly stuck to the mission of taking us out, no matter the damage and at any cost. Whilst at the same time not even entertaining the possibility that maybe just maybe there's no majority in favour of this any more and perhaps we might want to consider whether another referendum might be appropriate. She bangs on about the will of the (17m) people, never giving a thought to the 16m who opposed it and the 30m others who didn't vote at all. I'm convinced she's a closet leaver.
 
There won’t be any unrest. We don’t do that sort of stuff over here, not compared to a France.

Most people will give up caring soon enough.

Apathy is intrinsic to psyche of the British.
Most people will not care - about the people whose lives get ruined. Well done.
 
He thought the party's interests were in appeasing both sides in order to get a better/softer deal and thus give the country a choice. I'm not sure why that would not have been in the country's interests.

Resigning as leader would certainly have been in the party's interest.
I wonder how corbyn/labour would have done if he'd have assumed a much firmer position - either all out remain/revoke, or kept hold of some of the traditional labour vote by going all out leave? I'm guessing either would have been more successful in the GE.
 
Trump's made his mind up. Nowt to do with you or me.
I actually think we'll get a short term good deal out of him as he'll want to do his mates Boris and Nigel a favour and put one over on liberal/left-wing ney-sayers. Longer term I'm sure you are correct and the 'special relationship ' will not benefit the junior partner.
 
You mean we'll be leaving the EU with a manky deal or no deal before we have a deal with the USA...

I’m saying by the time we’ll come to negotiate with the US, Trump will not be President.

Nothing more, nothing less.
 
I wonder how corbyn/labour would have done if he'd have assumed a much firmer position - either all out remain/revoke, or kept hold of some of the traditional labour vote by going all out leave? I'm guessing either would have been more successful in the GE.

He did really well in the first snap election by pledging to honour the result, there's no doubt that farcical position has a significant effect on the outcome for Labour. I can't imagine them sitting around the table thinking that was ever a good idea considering how passionately people feel about the issue.
 
And your point is what exactly?

I wanted to remain, we lost. I moved on. What of it.
You moved on 3 years after the referendum and then only because you thought a Corbyn government would be worse for the economy than Brexit.
 
You moved on 3 years after the referendum and then only because you thought a Corbyn government would be worse for the economy than Brexit.

Only partly true. I'd already been coming around to the realisation that this wasn't going to ever go away unless / until we left.

But let me throw you a bone and say Ok let's suppose what you say above is true. So what?
 
Hindsight is indeed 20/20

And it clearly shows how self-serving Corbyn was

Any hard Brexit outcome will be largely on him
A bit of a reach to blame a possible hard brexit on corbyn! I heard similar logic after he stood almost alone on not bombing Syria - some said he caused us to bomb Syria by taking that stance and therefore polarising opinion!
Corbyn has his faults, but a hard brexit (if it happens) is probably the fault of the hard brexiteers plus those that thought they were being clever by pretending they wanted a 'deal'.
 
Last edited:
Only partly true. I'd already been coming around to the realisation that this wasn't going to ever go away unless / until we left.

But let me throw you a bone and say Ok let's suppose what you say above is true. So what?
Good grief. You said "If we have voted to leave the EU, then leave we must and if it's economically damaging then we will have to accept that and deal with it" and thus you "moved on". It took you three years to accept it and move on and you now want to make some moral argument out of your latterday conversion. Welcome to Johnsonworld.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top