gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I remember someone telling me about a book on gun culture in southern states (realise that Connecticut is anything but) which was quite interesting.
It said that rural communities that owned livestock (as oppose to grew crops) were much more likely to own and use guns. This was because historically there was an enduring threat of their animals being stolen which needed to be met with force. In the UK communities such as those on the Celtic fringes and the West Country tended to fall into this category.
When the southern states were colonised it was primarily by Irish, Scots and Welsh (the English tended to emigrate to the North) and they continued where they left off and raised livestock. The threat of rustling, if anything, was even greater and being armed became an essential working tool.
Doesn't really add anything to the debate, but rural America's roots to gun culture go very deep and would, sadly, prove impossible to sever imo.
It said that rural communities that owned livestock (as oppose to grew crops) were much more likely to own and use guns. This was because historically there was an enduring threat of their animals being stolen which needed to be met with force. In the UK communities such as those on the Celtic fringes and the West Country tended to fall into this category.
When the southern states were colonised it was primarily by Irish, Scots and Welsh (the English tended to emigrate to the North) and they continued where they left off and raised livestock. The threat of rustling, if anything, was even greater and being armed became an essential working tool.
Doesn't really add anything to the debate, but rural America's roots to gun culture go very deep and would, sadly, prove impossible to sever imo.