Lucky13 said:
Blue Hefner said:
No I have not! Adding more guns, which ever way you look at it does not 'minimise risk'.
If that lad last Friday did not have access to a gun 26 people would not have died. If the security guard had a gun, he would have been the first to get shot, that makes 27. Sounds like increased risk to me
He didn't own a gun , he also could of been the first to be shot at the school.
I didn't say own, I said access to. Why would the security guard, presuming he is stood at the gates shoot him? For approaching a school, for looking funny? The lad had an assault rifle, I'm no expert but I imagine one of those can shoot someone from a fair distance.
I can see a headline now 'school security guard shoots man who was holding a tyre iron as he was about to ask to borrow a mobile phone'
This could go on for hours but my opinion is clear and clearly opposite to yours