franksinatra
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 10,712
Pretty much every city fan believes there is bias, in the way media reports on us vs other historee clubs, refereeing decisions in general (especially insidious minor things like allowing opponents to foul away while penalising city players at the first opportunity) or the whole ffp fiasco.
You don't believe it, fine.
What is pointless is haunting a thread like this and getting riled yourself, and annoying others.
I have seen that bastard mason run over the width of the pitch - actually run! - to yellow card dzeko for dissent.
Why? Because dzeko was fouled, and had the temerity to look towards him, hands outstretched, lip still bleeding from the elbow he had suffered.
We watch matches and read reports, and form our opinions based on what we see, not just blind devotion to city. Kindly don't come over and talk down to every fan here as if we are simpletons.
I certainly do not think City fans are simpletons and as always a poster like Exeter Blue makes some excellent points and raises examples which are worthy of discussion. Hence I researched the Zabba incident.
The only point where I have been riled is when someone decides to state I was another poster previously. I just cannot fathom that.
You are quite correct maybe staying out of the thread would have been a good idea but sometimes you are damned if you do and damned if you dont. But its a poor show if an alternative view cannot be stated within a thread.
As I have stated earlier personally I think football is too fast, too much simulation and too many camera angles to paint refs in a good light. Its an impossible task.
I have never been an advocate of video refereeing but the faith in the integrity of refereees is at an all time low, so if it could be implemented and cause minimal disruption to the game it could only be a good thing.