mcfc2607 said:tad weird?Jack74 said:De Niro really , thought u a where tad weird and now u have proved it.
MCFC OK
your one to talk with your constant David Silva bashing.
Yeah, that's 10/12m in fee (depending on who you believe) and around 15-18m pounds in wages. We have saved around 25-30m on this deal.MCFC-alan88 said:kun said:Aguero scored the same amount.MCFC-alan88 said:Indeed, 17 goals in all comps last season (according to Wikipedia) with the amount of chances we made last year? it's actually pretty poor.
He is a quality striker although there are better our there.
Aguero had a poor season also, I do not dispute that. I just think it's wise to get rid of the wages as well as make £10m on someone that is out of contract next year and likely to walk on a free. We'd have been in the same situation having to get a striker next year but without the money saved on wages and the transfer fee. So I'm pretty happy with that.
de niro said:tevez, balo, nige, aj all gone. not ONE replacement for any of them. well not worth having anyway,
MCFCBen said:Is this a cunning way to keep people off the Isco thread??
Our current front 5 is
Yaya Fernandinho
Navas Silva Nasri
Aguero
Is that so bad? Tevez isn't going to invade Silva's space anymore and Navas will offer width, which means teams can't defend as narrowly as last season against us.
This is before we bring in replacements!
Think it through, if we bought two strikers and then had to sell Tevez, we'd get even less as the buyer knows we have to sell.dom said:SWP's back said:No.de niro said:Would it not be wise to secure other assets before unloading the ones we have?
Why not
Surely bargaining from a position of bereftness put pressure on us ?
MCFC-alan88 said:kun said:Aguero scored the same amount.MCFC-alan88 said:Indeed, 17 goals in all comps last season (according to Wikipedia) with the amount of chances we made last year? it's actually pretty poor.
He is a quality striker although there are better our there.
Aguero had a poor season also, I do not dispute that. I just think it's wise to get rid of the wages as well as make £10m on someone that is out of contract next year and likely to walk on a free. We'd have been in the same situation having to get a striker next year but without the money saved on wages and the transfer fee. So I'm pretty happy with that.
MCFCBen said:dom said:SWP's back said:
Why not
Surely bargaining from a position of bereftness put pressure on us ?
Works both ways. If we have a replacement, we need to sell and therefore get less.
Pay less in the first place for a replacement and sell for less as a result, or sell for as much as we can get and then pay slightly more for replacements.
davymcfc said:I certainly think we let NDJ go too easily and now tevez. Not sure why we let two vital players slip away for well under their value.
kun said:Yeah, that's 10/12m in fee (depending on who you believe) and around 15-18m pounds in wages. We have saved around 25-30m on this deal.MCFC-alan88 said:kun said:Aguero scored the same amount.
He is a quality striker although there are better our there.
Aguero had a poor season also, I do not dispute that. I just think it's wise to get rid of the wages as well as make £10m on someone that is out of contract next year and likely to walk on a free. We'd have been in the same situation having to get a striker next year but without the money saved on wages and the transfer fee. So I'm pretty happy with that.