It's a sort of yes and a sort of no thing I think.But maybe we arent creating the chances for a striker to miss because the striker isnt there to create the chance for?
(If that makes any sense at all)
Having some sort of out and out goalscorer always is better than not. ESPECIALLY as a sub for games like this to confuse a defence. And even as a starter there will definitely be games where someone running around in the box has its upsides galore.
The thing is, we've had games like yesterday with strikers playing which people generally pretend never happened in this discussion. Also, we've broken down many parked buses without an established striker playing.
Under Pep at least, whenever this City side has had problems you can usually look back and pin it on fitness, mentality, and the Pep basics before anything like a single player issue.
In each of our 3 title wins under Pep we've had a long run of wins at some stage. Momentum is a significant thing for a team like this. That feeling of inevitability is what makes us our consistent best. Hopefully something clicks in the next 6 weeks and sets us on our way.