But what if this clinical striker didn't press as well from the front as Bernardo and Kevin do? Would we have been able to control games and kill them off like we have done so regularly this season? Do you think Kane would have covered the yards that Bernardo has? Do you think he would have been able to cover the yards Bernardo has while still scoring the number of goals required to justify the £150m that Spurs were asking for? It's easy to invent a hypothetical scenario and then say it would have been inevitable in a parallel universe, but you have absolutely no idea.
And outside of Kane, who else could we have signed to play up front? Haaland was a no-go last summer and we're in for him this coming summer anyway. Ings was a suggestion - I see he has a grand total of 4 goals this season. Ronaldo? I think we all know that would have been a disaster, looking at where it's got United. Vlahovic? More than possible, but he's very much a target man who doesn't do the same job that Pep wants his false #9s to be doing. All of a sudden, you're running out of options for this mythical super-striker who would have scored 20 goals already.
Also, who wants the league dead and buried in January? That would be awfully, awfully dull. I like going to City games with a bit of jeopardy - that way, wins feel more special. You can't really have football without drama and stakes, otherwise nobody would bother turning up. And when has the league ever been dead and buried in January, for that matter? Even in our 100 points year we got slapped silly by Liverpool around this point in the season. We're in a cracking position with a system that works. It ain't broke so don't fix it.