Chippy_boy
Well-Known Member
Agreed. Idiotic defending.Like you say, offside, but it wasn't that obvious that the Arsenal players could just stop playing. I'm not sure what the fuck they were thinking.
Agreed. Idiotic defending.Like you say, offside, but it wasn't that obvious that the Arsenal players could just stop playing. I'm not sure what the fuck they were thinking.
Looool :-)
the second image when David is marginly onside, the camera image is from this side, where as the Linesman is looking straight at David and cannot see the defender.I came on this thread to show how Silva was *definitely* offside, and I have to say I am surprised.
He is in fact offside, but it is much closer than I thought. And taking this "when did Fernandino actually play the ball" question into account, it varies from *just* off, to quite clearly off, depending on whether you go for the moment of first contact with Ferna's boot, or a tiny bit later than that. Either which way, Silva was off.
This is *before* Fernandino kicks the ball. Silva is on, but Ferna hasn't touched the ball yet. You can just make out his right boot peaking out from behind his left leg as he prepares to play the ball.
![]()
This is the first point Ferna touches the ball. Notice the ball has not moved yet. Silva is already (very marginally) off.
![]()
This is the point the ball clearly moves. Silva is even further off.
![]()
And finally, this is the point they choose to freeze the frame. The ball has long departed from Ferna's boot, and of course Silva is even more off by then.
![]()
The point though, is it was mighty close. A travesty of a refereeing decision, it was NOT.
That was brilliant wasn't it? Hahaha
people are looking at the stripe in the grass and judging silva and the last defender , maybe he was onside and the lino could see that ,he looked well off live on the telly
It just shows how tough it is to be a linesman. I'm in the lower tier of the East Stand pretty much directly in line with that and we were actually laughing as we thought he was miles offside. To see how marginal it actually was is quite suprising.
That was brilliant wasn't it? Hahaha
Pep on Wenger’s whinge: “the penalty was a penalty, the offside was offside but we won because we were better"
Really? Cheers, I haven't heard of that, and a quick search has not turned it up. You don't have a link do you?
Apparently, in my defence, the BBC haven't heard of it either, as whenever they review an offside decision (one of ours anyway) they freeze the frame just after the ball has been played. Of course, that's long enough to make a player look way offside.
Buzzing with the offside goal, hahaha! take it you fucking sanctimonious hypocrite whining tarquin cünts!
What a bunch of classless wankers those AFC fans and their sleeping bagged bitter manager.
Are there any worse than them lot? apart from the scum and candlefucks.
I initially thought that DS was offside by some distance.I came on this thread to show how Silva was *definitely* offside, and I have to say I am surprised.
He is in fact offside, but it is much closer than I thought. And taking this "when did Fernandino actually play the ball" question into account, it varies from *just* off, to quite clearly off, depending on whether you go for the moment of first contact with Ferna's boot, or a tiny bit later than that. Either which way, Silva was off.
This is *before* Fernandino kicks the ball. Silva is on, but Ferna hasn't touched the ball yet. You can just make out his right boot peaking out from behind his left leg as he prepares to play the ball.
![]()
This is the first point Ferna touches the ball. Notice the ball has not moved yet. Silva is already (very marginally) off.
![]()
This is the point the ball clearly moves. Silva is even further off.
![]()
And finally, this is the point they choose to freeze the frame. The ball has long departed from Ferna's boot, and of course Silva is even more off by then.
![]()
The point though, is it was mighty close. A travesty of a refereeing decision, it was NOT.