Matty said:
jlc09 said:
People keep talking about a lack of depth but it's not really the case. Bar the striker position where we need another body
GK: Szczesny, Fabianski, Viviano
RB: Sagna, Jenkinson
CB: Mertesacker, Koscielny, Vermaelen, Sagna covers as 4th option.
LB: Gibbs, Monreal
CM: Ramsey, Arteta, Flamini, Wilshere(and he can play AM, LW)
AM: Ozil, Rosicky
RW: Walcott, Chamberlain, now Gnabry
LW: Cazorla(also AM), Podolski
ST: Giroud..........Walcott/Podolski would fill in, then Bendtner.
Need another 2 quality signings to really push us on. For the most part we have two players for every position, just horrible luck with injuries so far.
Everyone has bodies to fullfil roles, that's why the Premier League squad is a 25 man one. It's the quality of those options, and their relative abilities in those roles, that matters.
Szczesny is an ok keeper, but not of the same quality as the keepers at the other top clubs. I'd chose Hart, Cech, Lloris, De Gea and probably Mignolet ahead of him.
At Centre Back they are short a body, and the overall quality of the 3 main options isn't great.
In midfield they ahve a plethora of talented options, but they have a plethora of very, very similar options. Where's the quality ball winner? Flamini is the nearest option to this (given Diaby complete inability to stay fit for more than 5 minutes) and he's not exactly exceptional. Wilshere, Ramsey, Arteta, Ozil, Cazorla and Rosicky are very similar styles of player, short in stature, great ball players, skillful, typical Arsenal midfielders. They don't have any size, or strength, or natural defensive qualities in there. Yaya Toure would walk through that midfield brushing them off like gnats, it's just not solid enough defensively.
The one area pretty much everyone agrees is short on numbers is upfront. Giroud is a front line striker, but the other options, like Walcott and Podolski (and this Sanogo bloke) are more your support striker role. Striker is the most prominent position on the pitch, strikers tend to be the most difficult players to find, a good goalscorer is an expensive and valuable possession, to say this is Arsenal's "only" area where depth is lacking is to ignore that this is the one area where you simply can't afford to be lacking in depth. There's a reason why City has Aguero, Dzeko, Negredo and Jovetic and why United have RVP, Rooney, Welbeck and Hernandez. There's also a reason why people have identified Chelsea's and Spur's forward line as their achilles heal too, a lack of quality depth.
Yes, for the most part Arsenal have 2 players for every position, but are they 2 quality players, or just 2 bodies that can fill a shirt?
im still constantly amazed as I've said in a previous post at the amount of lazy cliches and the same re-gurgitated media rubbish that comes out of some people in regards to arsenal.
firstly, regarding our defence:
everyone seems to keep making the same mistake over and over of looking at names and reputations rather then the actual player and their form. if you go by the former, then yes kompany vidic rio evra etc are better defenders. if you go by current performances/ability/form then stretching right back to the beginning of 2013 our defence has played better then anyones apart city.
you talk about us not having strength in depth yet you loose kompany and your entire defence turns to shite as witnessed this season (and also as admitted by a number of city fans on here as well). ONE player, thats all it takes. if you really had this strength in depth that everyone keeps banging on about (that arsenal supposedly don't have), then loosing just one player would not effect your team so much.
so to answer your question '2 quality players or just 2 bodies' -
left back - gibbs is one of the most in form left back in the league at the moment and monreal is a spanish international. so 2 quality players.
right back - sagna is a excellent right back and jenkinson is a very good young prospect thats played well there every time hes come into the team so certainly not just a body.
centre backs - vermalin mertesacker kos. 2 excellent right now and 1 potentially excellent if he gets his form back. seriously, how many of the top teams REALLY have 4/5 excellent centre backs?? none in my opinion. most have 1-2 excellent ones then maybe 1 or 2 very good back ups. arsenal no different in this regard. we've also got sagna whos very good as back there.
and for those that bang on about mertesacker, remember he has almost 100 caps for germany, probably the 2nd best team after spain. obviously those silly coaches just haven't realised that he's not very good, even after 100 caps.....doh.
midfield
this doesn't need any defending by me, its probably the best midfield in the league at the moment. and not many teams can stop someone like yaya, such is his power. but we have flamini/arteta/ramsey who are very strong and very switched on defensively, and good enough to deal with most players apart from the odd freaks like yaya. do chelsea or utd or spurs really have any player that can compare to or stop yaya? we are not alone in
that regard. \
in previous meetings, one area where we've almost always outclassed you is midfield, despite you having yaya. and our midfield is even stronger now then it was before.
to summarise yes we do have 2 quality players for almost every position apart from striker which i do realise is one of the most important.
BUT, when your whole team is scoring goals, you are much less reliant on a striker. again, simple facts - we are one of the highest goal scorers this season and also were last season - without having a world class striker like rvp or augero.
THE BOTTOM LINE is that no arsenal fan is saying we'll definitely win the league or that we're even the best team in the league. all we are saying is please look at our team, don't just read what the papers say. as a city fan said above, we have silently been building the foundations of a excellent team, and its slowly coming together. remember, this isn't just based on a few games or a blip of good form, this is going back over a long period.