Attacks in Paris

[inchy14]

Fucks sake does nobody read anything any more????? No I don't - I think an attack is inevitable - just think Cameron is walking onto a sucker punch

Then Cameron should make it clear he knows they'll try and attack the UK and he's striking first to limit their capabilities.

Nobody would blame him then apart from the lentil loving lefties

 

[bluethrunthru]

I think he's in an impossible situation and people will (or at least should) understand that. It's morally reprehensible to leave the attacks in Syria to other nations to keep our own nose clean.

But can you imagine the fallout - Cameron forces through a vote by the odd vote or two - them coming from the opposition. We bomb ISIS in Syria and then an attack in London???? Depending on the size and the success of the operation Cameron could find himself leaving office sooner tan he imagined

 

[bluethrunthru]

Then Cameron should make it clear he knows they'll try and attack the UK and he's striking first to limit their capabilities.

Nobody would blame him then apart from the lentil loving lefties

Ha - you'd make a superb political adviser - for a week or so

 

[inchy14]

Longer than Corbyn probably.

 

[CityStu]

But can you imagine the fallout - Cameron forces through a vote by the odd vote or two - them coming from the opposition. We bomb ISIS in Syria and then an attack in London???? Depending on the size and the success of the operation Cameron could find himself leaving office sooner tan he imagined

How about if we decide not to bomb ISIS in Syria and then there's an attack in London anyway? Cameron will be faced with huge anger that we weren't doing anything to diminish that threat by attacking their bases.

It's a fucking awful catch 22 and you're being very naive by believing the UK is safe unless we do bomb Syria.

 

[inchy14]

How about if we decide not to bomb ISIS in Syria and then there's an attack in London anyway? Cameron will be faced with huge anger that we weren't doing anything to diminish that threat by attacking their bases.

It's a fucking awful catch 22 and you're being very naive by believing the UK is safe unless we do bomb Syria.

You can be advisor to the advisor...

 

[bluethrunthru]

How about if we decide not to bomb ISIS in Syria and then there's an attack in London anyway? Cameron will be faced with huge anger that we weren't doing anything to diminish that threat by attacking their bases.

It's a fucking awful catch 22 and you're being very naive by believing the UK is safe unless we do bomb Syria.

The godawful truth for Cameron politically is an attack in London would get his vote through parliament and mean any subsequent action could not be blamed on the bombing in Syria. That is unpalatable I know but politically that is the best time line for him.

 

[bluethrunthru]

Longer than Corbyn probably.

meaning? Did I miss something in school today? Is the word Corbyn now an insult? If thats the level of political discussion there is no hope in this country we may as well nuke as many places as we can before we get splatted ourselves FFS.

 

[CityStu]

The godawful truth for Cameron politically is an attack in London would get his vote through parliament and mean any subsequent action could not be blamed on the bombing in Syria. That is unpalatable I know but politically that is the best time line for him.

A lot would still blame him for not taking pre-emptive action. It's an awful decision to have to make and I don't know which way I'd make it. I just know I wouldn't begrudge Cameron at all for deciding to join in with Russia and France's efforts in Syria.

 

[cleavers]

What I am saying is at the moment ISIS say they are attacking "foes" who bomb them in Syria. We haven't so haven't been attacked by that logic. If we bomb them in Syria then the attack comes Cameron will have committed a major political faux pas.

We did bomb them in Syria, the guy from Cardiff, and another.

If you really think we're not involved in Syria, then you're pretty naive. We're as big a target for IS as anyone else, they attacked us in Tunisia, because its much harder to mount an attack in the UK, because of that intelligence that you don't rate.

 

[bluethrunthru]

We did bomb them in Syria, the guy from Cardiff, and another.

If you really think we're not involved in Syria, then you're pretty naive. We're as big a target for IS as anyone else, they attacked us in Tunisia, because its much harder to mount an attack in the UK, because of that intelligence that you don't rate.

We are involved I know that - the drone coming back from the strike on petrol tankers in Iraq the other day came via Syria and got the intel for the strike on Jihadi John according to the M.O.D.

We haven't actually bombed them as Cameron hasn't won the vote yet

 

[inchy14]

meaning? Did I miss something in school today? Is the word Corbyn now an insult? If thats the level of political discussion there is no hope in this country we may as well nuke as many places as we can before we get splatted ourselves FFS.

Lighten up son it was a little joke, I went fishing and you bit, congratulations.

 

[grunge]

Depends on there motivation for attacks (Isis terror attacks), it appears that they are trying to pull as many counties into the war as they can, It legitimises there stance that the west is at war with Islam and they believe they are starting the "final war" aka the apocalypse.

Attacking them is playing into there hands, we should be supporting Assad and Iraq and letting them do it.

 

[cleavers]

We are involved I know that

So you think IS don't know that too, and aren't bothering with us, like I said naive.

As for the rest of your post, I can't reply to it, other than say its quite wrong, I could tell you how I know, but I'd probably get into trouble.

 

[Tanzeylee]

This guy seems to be putting the fear of god into isis.

Abu Azrael, aka the Iraqi Rambo aka the angel of death.

 

[TCIB]

@Tanzeylee



Not a fella to be fucked with, has seen decent training and more important 10 years field battle experience.

 

[bluethrunthru]

So you think IS don't know that too, and aren't bothering with us, like I said naive.

As for the rest of your post, I can't reply to it, other than say its quite wrong, I could tell you how I know, but I'd probably get into trouble.

Its ok mate I have signed the Act

 

[worsleyweb]

I would imagine this weeks events will have a huge negative impact on the Parisian economy. Will put a lot of people off visiting.

 

[kaz7]

I would imagine this weeks events will have a huge negative impact on the Parisian economy. Will put a lot of people off visiting.

The safest place to be after a bombing is there as there is so much security,the bombers will have moved on to somewhere else

 

[Tanzeylee]

@Tanzeylee



Not a fella to be fucked with, has seen decent training and more important 10 years field battle experience.

Watched a few of his YouTube vids, the guy doesn't mess about.