Gary James
Well-Known Member
1,431 below;-) It was March 1934. Only point to add though is that capacities back then were not as precise as they ought to have been (hence the problems with injuries etc.). I based a lot of my research on the planning applications for that period, as well as the newspapers of the day, and City increased capacity with a corner stand in 1931 (the raised corner between the Main Stand and Platt Lane - this had initially been exactly the same style as the other corners, but after only 8 years was extended to provide more capacity and also a few extra seats) and then again with the full Platt Lane extension in 1935 (the wooden bench terracing at the very back of the stand if anyone can remember - they put seats on the Platt Lane in the early 60s, but when it was extended in 1935 they extended with wooden terracing!). Those plans talked about potential capacity and then in later 1930s I have a capacity of 88,000 in a published book from the period.There is a light said:mancityvstoke said:MAINE ROAD PROGRESSIVE CAPACITY
· 1923 – 84,000
· 1931 – 86,000
· 1935 – 88,000
· 1946 – 84,000
· 1953 – 76,500
· 1957 – 77,000
· 1963 – 64,000
· 1972 – 54,500
· 1973 – 52,600
· 1989 – 48,500
· 1992 – 39,359
· 1994 – 19,150*
· 1995 – 31,458
· 1997 – 32,147
· 1999 – 34,026
· 2000 – 34,421
· 2002 – 35,150
So when 84,569 attended the QF against Stoke, we were still 3,000 short of capacity??
I bet the Rags of the day had a field day.
Utd having a field day - not a chance. They were getting average crowds of about 11,000 in the early 30s and some home crowds were a little over 3000. At one point Utd were the worst supported team in the First Division - a fate that City have never endured.