gordondaviesmoustache said:It amuses me that you use the term 'baddies' in the pejorative sense, when you've done little else on this thread other than try to cast Mancini in precisely that role.Didsbury Dave said:Mancini turned a tackle into a worldwide media event, so he's the one who blew it out of proportion. Oh wait a minute, have the see-no-evil monkeys settled on the press as the baddies? Pmslgordondaviesmoustache said:Yes, that's right. It has only been blown out of proportion by Mancini and no-one else.
It also amuses me that by accusing Mancini of blowing this incident out of proportion, you are, in fact, blowing his actions completely out of proportion.
Didsbury Dave said:Do you know billy? Because several of us do, including moderators. So who the fuck are you, someone no one has ever heard of or noticed, to suggest he's a liar?smithy167 said:andyhinch said:No probs,never fo'ed anyone, like hearing a bit of trough some cant handle it, it seems
They cant handle it because they are full of it and they know we know, its hilarious a couple of them on this thread reckon they are mates with Mario all of a sudden they let it out now in this thread, billy shears used to say he was good mates with ste ireland (and Mario now) full of shit.
I think if you're going to call a well known poster a liar then you should tell us who you are and what gives you the right to say that. Or if you aren't prepared to give us your credentials then you should apologise and admit you don't know who billy knows and you made a baseless, snidey accusation.
DD's more than capable of handling himself.Manc in London said:gordondaviesmoustache said:It amuses me that you use the term 'baddies' in the pejorative sense, when you've done little else on this thread other than try to cast Mancini in precisely that role.Didsbury Dave said:Mancini turned a tackle into a worldwide media event, so he's the one who blew it out of proportion. Oh wait a minute, have the see-no-evil monkeys settled on the press as the baddies? Pmsl
It also amuses me that by accusing Mancini of blowing this incident out of proportion, you are, in fact, blowing his actions completely out of proportion.
I am not into cheerleading or ganging up on posters but I have to say that is a great post by GDM.
gordondaviesmoustache said:It amuses me that you use the term 'baddies' in the pejorative sense, when you've done little else on this thread other than try to cast Mancini in precisely that role.Didsbury Dave said:Mancini turned a tackle into a worldwide media event, so he's the one who blew it out of proportion. Oh wait a minute, have the see-no-evil monkeys settled on the press as the baddies? Pmslgordondaviesmoustache said:Yes, that's right. It has only been blown out of proportion by Mancini and no-one else.
It also amuses me that by accusing Mancini of blowing this incident out of proportion, you are, in fact, blowing his actions completely out of proportion.
Manc in London said:gordondaviesmoustache said:It amuses me that you use the term 'baddies' in the pejorative sense, when you've done little else on this thread other than try to cast Mancini in precisely that role.Didsbury Dave said:Mancini turned a tackle into a worldwide media event, so he's the one who blew it out of proportion. Oh wait a minute, have the see-no-evil monkeys settled on the press as the baddies? Pmsl
It also amuses me that by accusing Mancini of blowing this incident out of proportion, you are, in fact, blowing his actions completely out of proportion.
I am not into cheerleading or ganging up on posters but I have to say that is a great post by GDM.
You think you're clever, but you fell for thisDidsbury Dave said:Mancini turned a tackle into a worldwide media event, so he's the one who blew it out of proportion. Oh wait a minute, have the see-no-evil monkeys settled on the press as the baddies? Pmslgordondaviesmoustache said:Yes, that's right. It has only been blown out of proportion by Mancini and no-one else.forevermancity said:Blown out of proportion by Mancini yes
So your position should now be that we believe everyone unless we can prove they're lying? Excellent, as you're now on record as saying this, I will refer to this post every time you instruct the forum that they shouldn't believe x, y or z because they might have a reason not to tell the truth. No, you'll have to prove they are lying, not that they might have a reason to lie, but that they are lying.Didsbury Dave said:Do you know billy? Because several of us do, including moderators. So who the fuck are you, someone no one has ever heard of or noticed, to suggest he's a liar?
I think if you're going to call a well known poster a liar then you should tell us who you are and what gives you the right to say that. Or if you aren't prepared to give us your credentials then you should apologise and admit you don't know who billy knows and you made a baseless, snidey accusation.
Skashion said:So your position should now be that we believe everyone unless we can prove their lying? Excellent, as you're now on record as saying this, I will refer to this post every time you instruct the forum that they shouldn't believe x, y or z because they might have a reason not to tell the truth. No, you'll have to prove they are lying, not that they might have a reason to lie, but that they are lying.Didsbury Dave said:Do you know billy? Because several of us do, including moderators. So who the fuck are you, someone no one has ever heard of or noticed, to suggest he's a liar?
I think if you're going to call a well known poster a liar then you should tell us who you are and what gives you the right to say that. Or if you aren't prepared to give us your credentials then you should apologise and admit you don't know who billy knows and you made a baseless, snidey accusation.
Also, interesting that you think the media couldn't possibly be blowing this out of proportion. Again your usual stance, when dismissing agendists, is that the media follow their financial interests - I agree, and their financial interest is to create a story where there isn't one. It's called sensationalism.
They aren't entitled to that opinion when it is baseless and known to be false by at least about 30 odd people that know who Billy is, including the site owner.BluePurgatory said:Didsbury Dave said:Do you know billy? Because several of us do, including moderators. So who the fuck are you, someone no one has ever heard of or noticed, to suggest he's a liar?smithy167 said:They cant handle it because they are full of it and they know we know, its hilarious a couple of them on this thread reckon they are mates with Mario all of a sudden they let it out now in this thread, billy shears used to say he was good mates with ste ireland (and Mario now) full of shit.
I think if you're going to call a well known poster a liar then you should tell us who you are and what gives you the right to say that. Or if you aren't prepared to give us your credentials then you should apologise and admit you don't know who billy knows and you made a baseless, snidey accusation.
You need to chill DD, all this hating is getting to you. Its a forum and everyone is entitled to their opinion regardless if they are a "well known poster" Posters have been called far worse things than a liar. And you have to admit that some posts on here are very economic with the truth!