Blue Mooner
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Jun 2005
- Messages
- 3,139
Re: Balotelli (continued - bust up with Mancini pg 18)
the majority on here I would surmise don't give two hoots who the regular clique posters on here know, frankly you're almost as bad as talksport, one might suspect that you simply take opposing viewsto stimulate debate on the forum!
tbh I suspect 'billy' is full of sh*t and stating something as fact simply to suit his argument. just because 30 of you (whhoooo!) know him doesn't mean he isn't capable of spouting sh*t like anyone on here. my mate knew his wife for 5 years and didn't realise she had been spouting sh*t for the last 2.
just because someone is known by the mods does not mean they are any less open to criticism when they state something inflammatory as fact and without any real evidence.
if anything Mario should be in awe of mancini for sticking by him when many other managers would have given up on him and that is why I believe billy is talking sh*te.
SWP's back said:samharris said:SWP's back said:They aren't entitled to that opinion when it is baseless and known to be false by at least about 30 odd people that know who Billy is, including the site owner.
If I decided to label you a fiddler of horses, would I be entitled to that opinion?
So 30 on here know who billy is ?? what about the 52 odd thousand that dont..??
people are well within their rights to call someone a liar when a statement is not backed up with viable proof.. (it happens in courts around the world on a daily basis).
Have any of these 30 given any proof as to whether Billy is telling the truth or do we take it on face value..??
Face value doesnt exist on here...the transfer thread is testament to that.
The poster said "billy shears used to say he was good mates with ste ireland (and Mario now) full of shit."
Now does he have any evidence to back that up? Especially when as stated, lots of people knew that Billy is good mates with Ireland. Including ric who has known Billy since they were kids.
the majority on here I would surmise don't give two hoots who the regular clique posters on here know, frankly you're almost as bad as talksport, one might suspect that you simply take opposing viewsto stimulate debate on the forum!
tbh I suspect 'billy' is full of sh*t and stating something as fact simply to suit his argument. just because 30 of you (whhoooo!) know him doesn't mean he isn't capable of spouting sh*t like anyone on here. my mate knew his wife for 5 years and didn't realise she had been spouting sh*t for the last 2.
just because someone is known by the mods does not mean they are any less open to criticism when they state something inflammatory as fact and without any real evidence.
if anything Mario should be in awe of mancini for sticking by him when many other managers would have given up on him and that is why I believe billy is talking sh*te.