St Helens Blue (Exiled)
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2011
- Messages
- 13,796
Not for me.
stony said:There are no footballing reasons to have Balotelli back.
Although he didn't particularly fit here, unlike other players who we could sign and haven't played for our club, he can be judged also on his time here. A liability, a red card waiting to happen with a few glimpses of what he can do. Had a good season when we won the title, nothing spectacular. We wouldn't achieved what we have without him and he had some very direct influences into our trophies but when you judged his overall contribution; it wasn't good enough. He also plays for himself a lot, and his last half a season here was garbage.Damocles said:stony said:There are no footballing reasons to have Balotelli back.
Unlike Jovetic and Negredo he can stay fit. He can play up the top holding up the ball and is particularly great at the same thing all Italian strikers are: getting a ball over the top or through the middle and finishing one-on-one with the keeper which would fit our current team much more than the style we used to play where he was a bit of a square peg in a round hole. He can also do a job out wide and cutting side if asked to. He's as good if not better than Negredo but 5 years younger
He's popular with most of the staff/squad and Dzeko, Hart and Zabaleta have all said how much they enjoyed having him at City and playing with him. In addition to this he seems to have calmed down since his engagement and is much more professional on the pitch.
It's quite the opposite I find - people don't want him because of the circus he brings off the field rather than disliking him as an actual footballer.
Damocles said:stony said:There are no footballing reasons to have Balotelli back.
Unlike Jovetic and Negredo he can stay fit. He can play up the top holding up the ball and is particularly great at the same thing all Italian strikers are: getting a ball over the top or through the middle and finishing one-on-one with the keeper which would fit our current team much more than the style we used to play where he was a bit of a square peg in a round hole. He can also do a job out wide and cutting side if asked to. He's as good if not better than Negredo but 5 years younger
He's popular with most of the staff/squad and Dzeko, Hart and Zabaleta have all said how much they enjoyed having him at City and playing with him. In addition to this he seems to have calmed down since his engagement and is much more professional on the pitch.
It's quite the opposite I find - people don't want him because of the circus he brings off the field rather than disliking him as an actual footballer.
Damocles said:stony said:There are no footballing reasons to have Balotelli back.
Unlike Jovetic and Negredo he can stay fit. He can play up the top holding up the ball and is particularly great at the same thing all Italian strikers are: getting a ball over the top or through the middle and finishing one-on-one with the keeper which would fit our current team much more than the style we used to play where he was a bit of a square peg in a round hole. He can also do a job out wide and cutting side if asked to. He's as good if not better than Negredo but 5 years younger
He's popular with most of the staff/squad and Dzeko, Hart and Zabaleta have all said how much they enjoyed having him at City and playing with him. In addition to this he seems to have calmed down since his engagement and is much more professional on the pitch.
It's quite the opposite I find - people don't want him because of the circus he brings off the field rather than disliking him as an actual footballer.
Blue Til Death said:I would have him back any day, I think he would do well second time around and just to have him on the pitch playing the rags would be worth his wages.. !