Scaring Europe to Death said:
Your comments about Bayern’s youth policy in the 60s are 100% correct, but then again you’re replying to an opinion that hasn’t actually been made.
Bayern’s team of the 70s included a core of local talent, as did Ajax, St Etienne, and Liverpool. However, that was in the days of the old style European Cup.
The Champions League wasn’t revamped to make a better competition. It was revamped purely to make the rich clubs richer. and the recent TV deal will exaggerate the gulf in finances even further.
We now have a culture of “Super Clubs” and this is why City feel like unwelcome guests at somebody else’s party.
We respect Bayern, but it’s obvious from Rummenigge’s comments that he considers City to be some kind of modern day plastic outfit, like Wolfsburg or Leverkusen. when in reality we have always been one of the best supported teams in England.
Incidentally, City won the League in 1937.
Enjoy the match
I don't support a "Super Club".
As far as I'm concerned there are only 3 1/2 of those. Real, Barca and Bayern. A club based near you fulfills some of the criteria.
I only commented, because I think they are a magnificent club.
The local core of talent you refer to is part of that. They are still built around local players ( Muller, Lahm, Schweinsteiger) supplemented with bought in German and foreign talent.
Even the board are true Bayern men, including the maligned Hoeness and Rummenigge?
Did the latter call City a plastic club?
If they didn't tolerate non "Superclubs", then they'd have a private league consisting of them, their two Spanish friends and ManUtd.