Braggster
Well-Known Member
Fair enough, didn't know that (though I find it utterly absurd I must say). I'm quite confident an English court would accept jurisdiction (it's very difficult to completely contract out of the courts' jurisdiction), whether first instance or appellate, but obviously we won't be burning political bridges of that nature over a clapped out welshman...Chick Counterfly said:Braggster said:Pandev did get his contract annulled-under Italian law. In other words it's a precedent of dubious value. Oh, and good luck getting a decision on a dispute of this nature from an English court in less than a year at a minimum...
it was a tribunal, just like it would be here. UEFA have special dispensation from the EU, they pass this on to the National Associations and Leagues. It could be challenged in a court of law, but I take you back to point 1, UEFA have special dispensation from the EU. Lotito didn't appeal.
I think we're okay though. Bellamy's situation is very different. He'll have a club to train and play with, it's the lack of this that constituted 'Sporting Just Cause' in Pandev's case.... and he was never branded a rebel or excluded, until he hanged himself in his interviews.
It does mean the Pandev dispute is more relevant, but even so it's not an English precedent, so caveat avocat...and my memory of similar FA/PL hearings is that they're heavily influenced by and populated with people from the English legal system.