BELLAMY

Bluemoon115 said:
vbr said:
fatbloke said:
vbr said:
We looked really tame upfront today apart from Bellamy, the two DMs just didn't work and Zabaleta was constantly giving it away or overhitting passes. I think at home we need to be more aggressive and against Boro who are fucking dire why didn't we go for the jugular and play one DM? Away from home I can see the 2 DM system, but not at home. I think Caicedo and Bellamy upfront all game would have been a better option, we needed a more physical presence up there with Bellamy.

Some people are absolutely fucking clueless.

Three wins in four games with only two goals conceeded since we started playing two defensive midfielders tells me it's working.

You're fucking clueless, mate, did you not see the 3 clear-cut chances that Boro carved out and if it wasn't for Given we could have been 3-0 down before half-time. For you to tell me it's working when Boro rolled us over at times is fucking clueless. We conceded soft goals against Stoke and Newcastle and looked shaky as fuck at times against Boro and pretty much most of the game against Wigan, so shut the fuck up you clueless twat.

Yet again your agenda shines through.

It could have easily been 3-3 at half time, but you miss off our chances as that doesn't suit your argument.

Fuckwit.

The closest we came to scoring in the first half was when we hit the bar with the diving header. That's one chance, not three you tit. Clear-cut chances we had in the first half? None. Pull your head out of your arse, son, if you think we didn't look shaky at the back in all our previous games maybe you need to see the doctor because you're deluded.
 
I don't care if it is or if it aint working as long as it wins us matches like today!
 
vbr said:
fatbloke said:
vbr said:
We looked really tame upfront today apart from Bellamy, the two DMs just didn't work and Zabaleta was constantly giving it away or overhitting passes. I think at home we need to be more aggressive and against Boro who are fucking dire why didn't we go for the jugular and play one DM? Away from home I can see the 2 DM system, but not at home. I think Caicedo and Bellamy upfront all game would have been a better option, we needed a more physical presence up there with Bellamy.

Some people are absolutely fucking clueless.

Three wins in four games with only two goals conceeded since we started playing two defensive midfielders tells me it's working.

You're fucking clueless, mate, did you not see the 3 clear-cut chances that Boro carved out and if it wasn't for Given we could have been 3-0 down before half-time. For you to tell me it's working when Boro rolled us over at times is fucking clueless. We conceded soft goals against Stoke and Newcastle and looked shaky as fuck at times against Boro and pretty much most of the game against Wigan, so shut the fuck up you clueless twat.
The fact that Given was MOM backs you up

Thought City were generally poor today, and the back 4 got exposed one for one too many times. On paper, Zab and De Jong should have shored up the defence, but we gave the ball away far too often

But we won, and that's the main thing, and we will only improve
 
.[/quote]

You're fucking clueless, mate, did you not see the 3 clear-cut chances that Boro carved out and if it wasn't for Given we could have been 3-0 down before half-time. For you to tell me it's working when Boro rolled us over at times is fucking clueless. We conceded soft goals against Stoke and Newcastle and looked shaky as fuck at times against Boro and pretty much most of the game against Wigan, so shut the fuck up you clueless twat.[/quote]

Yet again your agenda shines through.

It could have easily been 3-3 at half time, but you miss off our chances as that doesn't suit your argument.

Fuckwit.[/quote]

The closest we came to scoring in the first half was when we hit the bar with the diving header. That's one chance, not three you tit. Clear-cut chances we had in the first half? None. Pull your head out of your arse, son, if you think we didn't look shaky at the back in all our previous games maybe you need to see the doctor because you're deluded.[/quote]

Haha 1 chance to score 1st half? Did you see the game?
 
vbr said:
fatbloke said:
vbr said:
We looked really tame upfront today apart from Bellamy, the two DMs just didn't work and Zabaleta was constantly giving it away or overhitting passes. I think at home we need to be more aggressive and against Boro who are fucking dire why didn't we go for the jugular and play one DM? Away from home I can see the 2 DM system, but not at home. I think Caicedo and Bellamy upfront all game would have been a better option, we needed a more physical presence up there with Bellamy.

Some people are absolutely fucking clueless.

Three wins in four games with only two goals conceeded since we started playing two defensive midfielders tells me it's working.

You're fucking clueless, mate, did you not see the 3 clear-cut chances that Boro carved out and if it wasn't for Given we could have been 3-0 down before half-time. For you to tell me it's working when Boro rolled us over at times is fucking clueless. We conceded soft goals against Stoke and Newcastle and looked shaky as fuck at times against Boro and pretty much most of the game against Wigan, so shut the fuck up you clueless twat.

Yes I did but that's the Premiership for you. Even the Scum down the road have conceeded 10 goals in 23 games and they play with 14 players every week if you include the referee and two linesmen. If it was that easy we'd all be Premiership managers.

PS... Nice to see another internet hard man telling someone to shut the fuck up. You win.
 
fatbloke said:
vbr said:
fatbloke said:
vbr said:
We looked really tame upfront today apart from Bellamy, the two DMs just didn't work and Zabaleta was constantly giving it away or overhitting passes. I think at home we need to be more aggressive and against Boro who are fucking dire why didn't we go for the jugular and play one DM? Away from home I can see the 2 DM system, but not at home. I think Caicedo and Bellamy upfront all game would have been a better option, we needed a more physical presence up there with Bellamy.

Some people are absolutely fucking clueless.

Three wins in four games with only two goals conceeded since we started playing two defensive midfielders tells me it's working.

You're fucking clueless, mate, did you not see the 3 clear-cut chances that Boro carved out and if it wasn't for Given we could have been 3-0 down before half-time. For you to tell me it's working when Boro rolled us over at times is fucking clueless. We conceded soft goals against Stoke and Newcastle and looked shaky as fuck at times against Boro and pretty much most of the game against Wigan, so shut the fuck up you clueless twat.

Yes I did but that's the Premiership for you. Even the Scum down the road have conceeded 10 goals in 23 games and they play with 14 players every week if you include the referee and two linesmen. If it was that easy we'd all be Premiership managers.

PS... Nice to see another internet hard man telling someone to shut the fuck up. You win.

Just as nice to see another internet hard man calling people absolutely fucking clueless.
 
Shooter 83 said:
Haha 1 chance to score 1st half? Did you see the game?

1 shot from Bellamy in the first half forced a decent but routine save from Jones, the other Bellamy shot was tame. Ireland hit the bar with his diving header. The rest of the shooting in the 1st half was poor. I count that as 1 proper chance? Did you watch the match?
 
vbr said:
Shooter 83 said:
Haha 1 chance to score 1st half? Did you see the game?

1 shot from Bellamy in the first half forced a decent but routine save from Jones, the other Bellamy shot was tame. Ireland hit the bar with his diving header. The rest of the shooting in the 1st half was poor. I count that as 1 proper chance? Did you watch the match?

What about the one that rolled along the line?


<a class="postlink" href="http://www.skysports.com/football/match_report/0,19764,11065_3004689,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.skysports.com/football/match ... 89,00.html</a>

Stats are for all to see. Or has someone made them up?
 
vbr...

That's an opinion, that's completely different from telling someone to shut the fuck up.

Ps... Anyone that's had the misery of seeing your other 1178 posts knows you're a fucking clueless WUM. If you're not a WUM then you need some serious psychological help to deal with your hatred of Hughes. It's scary.
 
Shooter 83 said:
vbr said:
Shooter 83 said:
Haha 1 chance to score 1st half? Did you see the game?

1 shot from Bellamy in the first half forced a decent but routine save from Jones, the other Bellamy shot was tame. Ireland hit the bar with his diving header. The rest of the shooting in the 1st half was poor. I count that as 1 proper chance? Did you watch the match?

What about the one that rolled along the line?


<a class="postlink" href="http://www.skysports.com/football/match_report/0,19764,11065_3004689,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.skysports.com/football/match ... 89,00.html</a>

Stats are for all to see. Or has someone made them up?

7 shots on target. 2 in the first half, 5 in the second. 10 off target. That doesn't look like 3 clear-cut chances in the first half to me mate!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.