BerkshireBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Jan 2015
- Messages
- 4,076
He wasn't, that's the point
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Benjamin Mendy - City lose case and Mendy awarded £11m in back pay (p168)
- Thread starter awest
- Start date
BerkshireBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Jan 2015
- Messages
- 4,076
it was dropped from that court appearance so it's irrelevent anywayIts not a charge, its a consequence. What happens is the CPS decide to charge. The police then lay then charge, and you get bailed to court. The courts then impose bail conditions. If you breach those conditions the police can take you back before the court, for breaching their rules. They act on what the court said. It isnt a new charge of a crime, its a broken promise that the court said you have to abide by in order to stay out before the trial is heard
Uncle Wally One Ball
Well-Known Member
We must be at crossed purposes now. It wasnt. Why did he end up being remanded to custody then?it was dropped from that court appearance so it's irrelevent anyway
GaudinoMotors
Well-Known Member
It's not Tombstone. We say remanded.Jailed you wally. He was jailed for a long time.
Not sentenced and therefore regarded as innocent until proven otherwise.
Seems a difficult concept on here.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
He’s a wee character.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I might have mentioned this before, breaching bail conditions isn’t a criminal offence. So it’s literally impossible to be convicted of it. So any such charge is going nowhere. I reckon the system wouldn’t let you charge someone for an offence that doesn’t exist. At least you like to think so!We must be at crossed purposes now. It wasnt. Why did he end up being remanded to custody then?
Jailed you wally. He was jailed for a long time.
Who you calling a fucking wally? I was talking about YOU. You said you'd be sacked if you were in the position Mendy was. I answered you wouldn't, you would possibly be suspended until the result of the trial was known. Once you were found not guilty, as he was, if your workplace had sacked you then you could take them to a tribunal. He was remanded in custody for a time for breaching his bail conditions. Eventually after a few appeals I believe he was bailed again.
Uncle Wally One Ball
Well-Known Member
I know this, thats my point, I was trying to explain it to the last fellaI might have mentioned this before, breaching bail conditions isn’t a criminal offence. So it’s literally impossible to be convicted of it. So any such charge is going nowhere. I reckon the system wouldn’t let you charge someone for an offence that doesn’t exist. At least you like to think so!
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
You might have your work cut out.I know this, thats my point, I was trying to explain it to the last fella
cleavers
Moderator
He wasn't "jailed" he was remanded in custody for breaking bail terms. There is a distinct difference, that said he was unable to turn up to work as a result, so for the period on remand I can't see how the club owe him a wage. No idea on the bonus side of things.Jailed you wally. He was jailed for a long time.