Uncle Wally One Ball
Well-Known Member
This
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Benjamin Mendy - City lose case and Mendy awarded £11m in back pay (p168)
- Thread starter awest
- Start date
Uncle Wally One Ball
Well-Known Member
Seems soYou might have your work cut out.
cleavers
Moderator
Was he into that as well ?He’s a wee character.
BerkshireBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Jan 2015
- Messages
- 4,080
at the end of the day. all this arguing is pointless. This is a contract battle and nobody knows how it's going to go
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Breaching your bail conditions simply reverses the position on the presumption of bail. It basically means you can’t be trusted when you’ve been given the benefit of the doubt, even though you’ve been charged with a criminal offence. So yes, people who don’t comply with bail conditions, without reasonable excuse, should have their liberty removed.He wasn't "jailed" he was remanded in custody for breaking bail terms. There is a distinct difference, that said he was unable to turn up to work as a result, so for the period on remand I can't see how the club owe him a wage. No idea on the bonus side of things.
If I was accused of a crime, and on bail, I’d make the fuck sure I complied with any bail condition(s). It’s got to be your main objective every day.
No excuses.
He wasn't "jailed" he was remanded in custody for breaking bail terms. There is a distinct difference, that said he was unable to turn up to work as a result, so for the period on remand I can't see how the club owe him a wage. No idea on the bonus side of things.
Logically you'd think as it was his own actions that led to him failing his bail conditions and being remanded into custody, then we wouldn't be liable to pay his wages during that time. I guess Mendy could counter argue that he should never have been in that position anyway as he was innocent. Complicated.
Bournemouth Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Mar 2015
- Messages
- 2,206
I can’t be bothered about this, we have bigger legal things to fight, and I just want to watch football
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Or possibly not…Seems so
decmancity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 12,998
No chance. Lawyers in the past two years would have taken plenty of that and we all know he had an entourage of "mates" who he was no doubt paying to stick aroundGot a net worth of 12 million dollars apparently so not potless.
Breaching your bail conditions simply reverses the presumption of bail. It basically means you can’t be trusted when you’ve been given the benefit of the doubt, even though you’ve been charged with a criminal offence.
If I was accused of a crime, and on bail, I’d make the fuck sure I complied with any bail condition(s). It’s got to be your main objective every day.
No excuses.
Yes. Staying out of the big house has to be your main objective. It was probably sheer arrogance of being a spoilt footballer used to getting his own way that made him not take it seriously.