blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 29,677
We'd only swap for Pavard if we think he's a suitable replacement.We didn't - we clearly wanted to keep walker. he refused.
We'd only swap for Pavard if we think he's a suitable replacement.We didn't - we clearly wanted to keep walker. he refused.
Come on, what does Txiki and co know? They should ask our own experts over here for advice.We'd only swap for Pavard if we think he's a suitable replacement.
So what now? Who in the market is the right profile that suits us and is actually attainable? We can only make 100m exceptions for cases like Gvardiol. And as you said, Walker is the one who refused and wants to go. What can we do other than replace him with what’s the best suited option on the market.We didn't - we clearly wanted to keep walker. he refused.
I told everyone Dias was going to be a fucking beast. Does that mean I'm allowed to say Pavard won't improve us at all?
In fact, with Walker on the way out, I'd say it's a fairly large downgrade.
It is so easy to negate the level at which City operate on the pitch. Makes total sense they’d go for a profile like this yeahThe only lesson here is once again Pep and co understand players need a certain pedigree to perform at our level. That’s why we don’t elevate Academy kids or loanees to replace senior names or very rarely sign players who haven’t proven themselves at a certain competitive level. No matter how much that is suggested here