A proportion of future profits , yes. Basically like remortgaging your house repayments for that come out of your future income. I’m not saying it was their best option, I don’t know what other options they had,. Whatever it’s not a corrupt option which was suggested in the the post I replied to.They‘re not doing that though, are they?
They've consolidated their debt as much as they can. They are now selling future profits off on top of that.
But they’ve already remortgaged before this.A proportion of future profits , yes. Basically like remortgaging your house repayments for that come out of your future income. I’m not saying it was their best option, I don’t know what other options they had,. Whatever it’s not a corrupt option which was suggested in the the post I replied to.
But they’ve already remortgaged before this.
You can’t remortgage your house for what it will be worth in 2040.
And Lewandowski.And then spend that on Raphinha.
Pure Gambling with club's future. As Someone said today city and PSG could write a letter to tebas expressing their concerns on thisAnd Lewandowski.
Are they banking on them being ”too big” to fold?
AmendedIt’s a bit like Bury or Derby or <insert struggling/bankrupt team here>The Rags selling their stadium off.
It helps in the immediate short term, but could cause the club to fold unless expenses are reined in.
Not sure Old Toilet is worth much these days.Amended
It’s what they have done though, I have no opinion on whether it’s a good plan, it’s a gamble on their part. We’ll have to wait and see if it pays off I don’t think anybody really knows one way or the other and won’t for a few years yet.But they’ve already remortgaged before this.
You can’t remortgage your house for what it will be worth in 2040.
Amended againNot sure Old Toilet is worth much these days.
How much would Tesco buy the plot of contaminated land for?
Yeah, however it’s the Bernardo thread pal (:You know I was talking about Grealish right?